On Mon Mar 15 11:17:35 2010, mjd@plover.com wrote:
Show quoted text
Thank you for your report [1], but is this causing an actual problem?
You may not be aware that Parse::BACKPAN::Packages is deprecated. It
was slow and inflexible. BackPAN::Index is its replacement,
Parse::BACKPAN::Packages has been reimplemented as a wrapper.
BackPAN::Index is faster and far more flexible than PBP. DBIx::Class
makes it so and accounts for over 30 of those deps. Without DBIx::Class
there is no module.
DBIC::Schema::Loader is not strictly necessary, but it keeps me from
having to maintain redundant DBIC schema definitions.
According to the CPAN deps report, all the deps are in good working
order. namespace::clean is a little shaky but its not a critical
failure and I'm sure they'll work it out. BackPAN::Index should install
fine from a CPAN shell.
http://deps.cpantesters.org/?module=BackPAN::Index;perl=latest
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=54483
I didn't think it worth preserving PBP in its original form. If you
wish to do so, I can give you the PAUSE keys for PBP and you can split
it out into its own dist and pre-BackPAN::Index form. Otherwise I
suggest converting any existing PBP code to use BI.
[1] What I originally wrote was "WHAT THE HELL KIND OF REPORT IS THAT,
MARK?!"