Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Mail-ListDetector CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 53012
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Mail-ListDetector

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: frequency [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Important
Broken in: 1.02
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Missing Copyright Information
Hi: While packaging your module for Debian, I noticed that it doesn't seem to mention copyright or license information. In Debian we need copyright/license information for all of the packages we upload. Could you give us (replying to this bug report is fine): years of copyright, copyright holders' names, copyright holders' e-mail addresses. Unfortunately without this information we cannot upload it. This is more than just a Debian issue. I'm not a lawyer, but it's my understanding that both copyright and licensing information is vital for the continued success of open source software. Copyright is what allows you to assert a license, and a license is what ensures open source remains open source, and that users can make use of your software. A great article discussing some of this is "What is Copyleft?" by Richard Stallman: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/ Thanks for releasing your work to the CPAN. I apologize in advance for the noise, as I understand that the last thing most authors want to deal with is legal administrivia like this. I do hope, however, that you could (in your continued generosity) help us with this request. Please also consider adding these statements to your code/package README, since we must distribute some evidence of copyright information if it is not in the source package itself. Cheers, Jonathan Yu On behalf of the Debian Perl Team
I'm not sure if it's enough for debian, but I've made the licensing much more explicit in the README file.
Changes made in the new 1.03 release.
Hi Michael, Sorry, I haven't had much time for my packaging work these days... I just took a look at the latest sources and notice there is still no copyright statement. We need something explicit like: Copyright 2009-2010, Michael Stevens <email@example.com> If you just leave a note here with the proper copyright statement and update it in your version control system, that's sufficient for us. We don't need you to release another version of your package. Cheers, Jonathan
On Thu Jul 01 15:43:11 2010, JAWNSY wrote: Show quoted text
> Hi Michael, > > Sorry, I haven't had much time for my packaging work these days... I > just took a look at the latest sources and notice there is still no > copyright statement. We need something explicit like: > > Copyright 2009-2010, Michael Stevens <email@example.com> > > If you just leave a note here with the proper copyright statement and > update it in your version control system, that's sufficient for us. We > don't need you to release another version of your package.
How's this? http://github.com/mstevens/Mail--ListDetector/commit/6d796766b4860dd319f6f828382cb91d6d1d03bd Inevitably a little vague but should be accurate.
To whom this may concern: This package was recently accepted into Debian unstable. Thanks again for your contribution to CPAN, and thanks for your commitment to open source. I'm marking this bug as resolved now, as the next release will carry a copyright notice which is satisfactory to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. Cheers, Jonathan On Sun Jul 11 17:44:09 2010, MSTEVENS wrote: Show quoted text
> On Thu Jul 01 15:43:11 2010, JAWNSY wrote:
> > Hi Michael, > > > > Sorry, I haven't had much time for my packaging work these days... I > > just took a look at the latest sources and notice there is still no > > copyright statement. We need something explicit like: > > > > Copyright 2009-2010, Michael Stevens <email@example.com> > > > > If you just leave a note here with the proper copyright statement
> and
> > update it in your version control system, that's sufficient for us.
> We
> > don't need you to release another version of your package.
> > How's this? > > http://github.com/mstevens/Mail-- > ListDetector/commit/6d796766b4860dd319f6f828382cb91d6d1d03bd > > Inevitably a little vague but should be accurate.