Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the IPDR CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 51118
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: IPDR

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: ANDK [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: 0.19
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Fails without 'use64bitint'
The cpantesters have right now collected 50 PASS and 39 FAIL. All PASS have 'use64bitint' defined while all FAIL have not. Intentional? If it is intentional, you might want to prevent testing at all for non-64bit installations other wise you get an ugly PASS:FAIL ratio. See http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes for hints how to do it. Let me know if you need further informations. Thanks,
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #51118] Fails without 'use64bitint'
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:28:28 +0000 (GMT)
To: Andreas Koenig via RT <bug-IPDR [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: "Andrew S. Kennedy" <shamrock [...] cpan.org>
Hi, Thanks for the heads up. Will have a look at how to do it and modify the make file for the next release. regards, Andrew. On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Andreas Koenig via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> Thu Nov 05 00:42:05 2009: Request 51118 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by ANDK > Queue: IPDR > Subject: Fails without 'use64bitint' > Broken in: 0.19 > Severity: Normal > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: ANDK@cpan.org > Status: new > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=51118 > > > > The cpantesters have right now collected 50 PASS and 39 FAIL. All PASS > have 'use64bitint' defined while all FAIL have not. Intentional? > > If it is intentional, you might want to prevent testing at all for > non-64bit installations other wise you get an ugly PASS:FAIL ratio. See > http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes for hints how to do it. > Let me know if you need further informations. > > Thanks, > >
this has now been resolved in the 0.20 release of the module. The test was testing on a use64bitint perl and a non use64bitint perl and returned correctly. Andrew. On Thu Nov 05 00:42:05 2009, ANDK wrote: Show quoted text
> The cpantesters have right now collected 50 PASS and 39 FAIL. All PASS > have 'use64bitint' defined while all FAIL have not. Intentional? > > If it is intentional, you might want to prevent testing at all for > non-64bit installations other wise you get an ugly PASS:FAIL ratio. See > http://wiki.cpantesters.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes for hints how to do it. > Let me know if you need further informations. > > Thanks,