Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Parse-RPM-Spec CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 50785
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Parse-RPM-Spec

People
Owner: DAVECROSS [...] cpan.org
Requestors: steve [...] bnci.biz
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 0.04



Subject: Bug in Parse-RPM-Spec-0.03
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:50:57 +0000
To: bug-Parse-RPM-Spec [...] rt.cpan.org, dave [...] mag-sol.com
From: Steve Goldner <steve [...] bnci.biz>
Hello Dave! I think I have a bug report for you. perl version 5.8.8 OS: Linux 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 10:50:49 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Parse::RPM::Spec version 0.03 Issue: BuildArch is not implemented. Using Eclipse Epic Editor it allows the choice of $spec->buildarch() Code line 22 lists buildarch: has buildarch => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Str' ); but, in the While loop starting at line 59, buildarch is not extracted. Also, the documentation states that buildarch is available. Thanks! -- Steve Goldner 919-607-3230 Skype - s.goldner
Steve, Yes, that does look like a bug. Thanks for pointing it out. I won't be able to work on this until Tuesday, but I'll fix it very soon after that. Cheers, Dave...
Version 0.04 fixes this and is en route to CPAN right now. Cheers, Dave...
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #50785] Bug in Parse-RPM-Spec-0.03
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:20:40 +0000
To: bug-Parse-RPM-Spec [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Steve Goldner <steve [...] bnci.biz>
Awesome! I will start using it tomorrow! Thanks. Steve - Steve Goldner 919-607-3230 Skype - s.goldner Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: DAVECROSS via RT <bug-Parse-RPM-Spec@rt.cpan.org> Reply-To: bug-Parse-RPM-Spec@rt.cpan.org To: steve@bnci.biz Subject: [rt.cpan.org #50785] Bug in Parse-RPM-Spec-0.03 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:11:53 -0400 <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=50785 > Version 0.04 fixes this and is en route to CPAN right now. Cheers, Dave...
Just noticed that when you replied to my mail closing this ticket, it got re-opened. So I'm closing it again :-) No need to reply - as it will open the ticket again :-/ Cheers, Dave...