Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the JSON-XS CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 49358
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: JSON-XS

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Unimportant
Broken in: 2.25
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: META.yml is not YAML?
See the subject. While the file can be parsed by YAML::Syck and YAML::XS (but not YAML.pm and YAML::Tiny), I see stuff like 'abstract' => 'null' which is probably not intended.
CC: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #49358] META.yml is not YAML?
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:58:05 +0200
To: Slaven_Rezic via RT <bug-JSON-XS [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Marc Lehmann <schmorp [...] schmorp.de>
Hi! You sent a possible bug report on or via rt.cpan.org. Please read this mail carefully if you want to be heard. Most likely, your report will be ignored. Please close the ticket again and sent it to the official contact address for the module in question (or send it to rt.cpan.org@schmorp.de). Why is this necessary? rt.cpan.org has many deficiencies which makes it tedious and hard to use, increasing the workload on the people who provide all the perl modules you probably appreciate (and that is really to be avoided - module authors should be able to invest all their time into improving their modules and not fighting with rt.cpan.org's bugs). Still, for some people, rt.cpan.org is useful to have, and some people even like it and really want to use it. That is fine, too. Unfortunately, the designers of rt.cpan.org didn't make their "service" optional - you can neither opt-in nor opt-out of rt.cpan.org as a module author. Just like a spammer, rt.cpan.org forces its "service" (whether wanted or unwanted) on everybody. Just like a spammer, they don't care for the people they actively hurt. Just like a spammer, they don't don't care to fix these issues and make their "service" ethically acceptable. You cannot even configure it to redirect tickets to somewhere else. Unfortunately, ignoring rt.cpan.org is not an option either: for people reporting possible bugs there is no indication that their report will be ignored, and for module authors it means they miss possibly vital bug reports (and of course it's a great impression if rt.cpan.org has lots of bug reports that are unanswered, making a module unmaintained when in fact the opposite might be true). This is why it is important that you delete/resolve your ticket. I am sorry that this wasted a bit of your time, but please understand that I am just as much a victim as you are - the problem is the unethical stance of the rt.cpan.org providers who force their "service" on everybody. Please redirect your bug report as stated in the beginning of this mail, and please consider petitioning the rt.cpan.org providers to stop their unethical behaviour and allow opt-in, opt-out, or some redirect option. Thanks a lot, Marc Lehmann <rt.cpan.org@schmorp.de>
of course it is valid yaml, and any contents are automatically generated by makemaker - if they are in error, pelase report the bug against makemaker, not this module.
and yaml:.tiny *documents* that it _cannot_ parse yaml, so using it as a proof that some file is not yaml because it can't parse it is rather weird. the problems with yaml:.tiny and meta.yml files are documented well.