On Fri Sep 25 08:15:27 2009, kmx@volny.cz wrote:
Show quoted text>
> > BTW, would a developer's release be fine with you?
If you can't get a regular release done in time, a dev release will work
- but it's not preferred.
[I'm popping in because I'm Strawberry Perl's maintainer/builder. kmx
has been "working for me" in trying to get this to work.]
Show quoted text> Note for you to understand our goal:
> - we have included into Oct2009 release the new binary libraries for
> libxml2 + libxslt (DLLs as well as dev files *.a/*.h).
> - the XML::LibXML(1.69) is already included in the release -
> XML::LibXSLT not (yet)
And we'd like to be able to do so, if possible. If you're not
comfortable with that, to at least have "cpan XML::LibXSLT" working.
...
Show quoted text> To sum up:
> - stable XML::LibXSLT might come later
> - but we want to be sure that our libxml2 + libxslt libraries in our
> Oct2009 release will allow users to easy install by: cpan XML::LibXSLT
>
> If you will be close to the release of new XML::LibXML + XML::LibXSLT I
> will be happy to test it on Win32/strawberry (if you find it useful).
>
> > What's the deadline for the October release?
> >
>
> I expect the release day to be as usual the last day of October.
Which means that I'll need to start building release candidates on the
16th of October, if July was any indication - so that's the "inclusion"
deadline, because what I do is to download a minicpan at that point to
keep things stable to build the RC's and the final against.
Speaking of which, feel free to use Beta2 to test against. That's what
it's for.