| Subject: | Dependency on Compress::Zlib by version reveals that you need >= 2.009 |
Adam Kennedy made you No 1 in the FAIL 100 at http://ali.as/top100/
so I did some regression testing of IO::Zlib against Compress::Zlib
versions which revealed some version dependencies that might interest you:
****************************************************************
Regression 'mod:Compress::Zlib'
****************************************************************
Name Theta StdErr T-stat
[0='const'] 1.0000 0.0074 135.21
[1='eq_1.41'] -1.0000 0.0850 -11.77
[2='eq_1.42'] -1.0000 0.0430 -23.27
[3='eq_1.4201'] -1.0000 0.0850 -11.77
[4='eq_2.003'] -0.3333 0.0695 -4.80
[5='eq_2.005'] -0.2857 0.0458 -6.23
[6='eq_2.006'] -0.0000 0.1199 -0.00
[7='eq_2.007'] -0.6667 0.0695 -9.59
[8='eq_2.008'] -0.0526 0.0108 -4.85
[9='eq_2.009'] -0.0000 0.0695 -0.00
[10='eq_2.010'] 0.0000 0.0386 0.00
[11='eq_2.011'] -0.0000 0.0213 -0.00
[12='eq_2.012'] -0.0000 0.0193 -0.00
[13='eq_2.015'] -0.0000 0.0108 -0.00
[14='eq_2.017'] -0.0000 0.0251 -0.00
[15='eq_2.019'] -0.0000 0.0197 -0.00
[16='eq_2.020'] -0.0000 0.0170 -0.00
[17='eq_n/a'] -0.0000 0.0218 -0.00
This means when you simply increase the dependency to 2.009 then all the
FAILs on cpantesters are moot.
I don't know if anybody still depends on the old Compress::Zlib
versions, I looked up and found that 2.009 was released 20 April 2008.
Seems like a time frame long enough to forget about the old failures.
Let me know if you need more information.
HTH & Regards,