Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Class-Accessor CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 45592
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Class-Accessor

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Unimportant
Broken in: 0.31
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Harmonization of class names used in Pod examples
At least I think it should be corrected that the examples for mk_ro_accessors and mk_wo_accessors have "package Foo" at the top, but use Class->mk_*_accessors below. This should be Foo->mk_*_accessors instead. But maybe it would be better to use __PACKAGE__->mk_*accessors throughout the documentation? If you don't think so, then it would be nice if the sample class would be called the same in the documentation. Currently I see there "My::Class", "Class", and "Foo". Also, the SYNOPSIS has "package Employee", but uses then Foo->new. Regards, Slaven
Fixed in 0.33. -- Marty