| CC: | bug-Date-Leapyear [...] rt.cpan.org |
| Subject: | Re: Re-license Date-Leapyear |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:06:44 -0400 |
| To: | Xavier Bachelot <xavier [...] bachelot.org> |
| From: | Rich Bowen <rbowen [...] rcbowen.com> |
I was virtually certain that all the Perl stuff I'd done was under the
dual license.
I have absolutely no problem relicensing it under those terms.
However, it's been so long since I've touched the code that I'm not
even sure I have it in svn any more. I'll look around and see what I
can find. What's your timeline?
--Rich
On Mar 17, 2009, at 15:03, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Show quoted text
> Hi,
>
> Would you consider re-licensing Date-Leapyear under either the same
> terms as perl (GPL or Artistic), or under the terms of the Artistic
> license v2.0?
>
> I'm packaging Date-Leapyear for Fedora, for
> which the original Artistic license is problematic (see also
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#ArtisticLicense).
>
> Regards,
> Xavier
>
--
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart
enough to understand the game, and dumb enough to think it's
important. (Eugene McCarthy)