Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Archive-Cpio CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 43597
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: Archive-Cpio
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: rsrchboy [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Important
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Wed Feb 25 04:08:03 2009 rsrchboy [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: License of Archive::Cpio?
I'm looking to package Archive::Cpio for Fedora, but I can't seem to find the license for this package. Did you intend to license this package "under the same terms as Perl itself", that is, GPL v1+ and the Artistic License? (or maybe the LGPL v2+...? :))
  Wed Feb 25 04:21:29 2009 tmp [...] merd.net - Correspondence added
On Wed Feb 25 04:08:03 2009, RSRCHBOY wrote: Show quoted text
> I'm looking to package Archive::Cpio for Fedora, but I can't seem to > find the license for this package. > > Did you intend to license this package "under the same terms as Perl > itself", that is, GPL v1+ and the Artistic License? (or maybe the LGPL > v2+...? :))
yeah, same as Perl. I'll try to add a mention of it in next release. thanks
  Wed Feb 25 04:21:30 2009 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Tue May 09 06:47:34 2017 bitcardbmw [...] lsmod.de - Correspondence added
From: bitcardbmw [...] lsmod.de
On Wed Feb 25 04:21:29 2009, PIXEL wrote: Show quoted text
> On Wed Feb 25 04:08:03 2009, RSRCHBOY wrote:
> > I'm looking to package Archive::Cpio
> yeah, same as Perl. I'll try to add a mention of it in next release. thanks
I'm also looking for more explicit licensing information. seems to be missing in current version 0.10
  Fri Jan 18 09:11:21 2019 ppisar [...] redhat.com - Correspondence added
Dne St 25.úno.2009 04:21:29, PIXEL napsal(a): Show quoted text
> On Wed Feb 25 04:08:03 2009, RSRCHBOY wrote:
> > I'm looking to package Archive::Cpio for Fedora, but I can't seem to > > find the license for this package. > > > > Did you intend to license this package "under the same terms as Perl > > itself", that is, GPL v1+ and the Artistic License? (or maybe the LGPL > > v2+...? :))
> > yeah, same as Perl. I'll try to add a mention of it in next release.
Could please do that. There is yet another attempt to get your code into Fedora <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666844> and it will probably fail because of that.