Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Net-SMTP-Pipelining CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 43500
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Net-SMTP-Pipelining

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: ANDK [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: v0.0.1
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Tests faililng due to wrong usage of skip
Skip takes two arguments. The following pseudo patch fixes the issue for me: - skip "Net::Server::Mail not installed" if exists hasnt{netservermail}; + skip "Net::Server::Mail not installed", 70 if exists hasnt{netservermail}; The bug can only be seen when Net::Server::Mail is not installed. The result looks like in this report: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2009/02/msg3324456.html HTH,
Thanks for the report. Fixed just now with the upload of v0.0.2 Marc
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #77160] Expected and got coordinates may differ
From: "Justin Hunter via RT" <bug-Geo-Coder-Google [...] rt.cpan.org>
To: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 10:14:53 -0400
<URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=77160 > I have released 0.10_01 that relaxes the precision required. On Mon May 21 08:49:58 2012, HMBRAND wrote: Show quoted text
> I see the same, it might very well have to be caused by the perl > configured with -Duselongdouble (mine are) > > This is perl 5, version 16, subversion 0 (v5.16.0) built for i686- > linux-64int-ld > Compile-time options: HAS_TIMES PERLIO_LAYERS PERL_DONT_CREATE_GVSV > PERL_MALLOC_WRAP PERL_PRESERVE_IVUV > PERL_USE_DEVEL > USE_64_BIT_INT USE_LARGE_FILES USE_LOCALE > USE_LOCALE_COLLATE USE_LOCALE_CTYPE > USE_LOCALE_NUMERIC USE_LONG_DOUBLE USE_PERLIO > USE_PERL_ATOF > > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /pro/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" > "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t > t/00_compile.t .. ok > t/01_v2_live.t .. 1/5 > # Failed test at t/01_v2_live.t line 13. > # -122.39738200 and -122.39742600 are not equal to within 0.0000001 > t/01_v2_live.t .. 5/5 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 5. > t/01_v2_live.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > Failed 1/5 subtests > (less 1 skipped subtest: 3 okay) > t/02_v3_live.t .. 1/8 > # Failed test at t/02_v3_live.t line 11. > # 37.77893980 and 37.77890700 are not equal to within 0.0000001 > > # Failed test at t/02_v3_live.t line 12. > # -122.39738200 and -122.39742600 are not equal to within 0.0000001 > # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 8. > t/02_v3_live.t .. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) > Failed 2/8 subtests > (less 1 skipped subtest: 5 okay) > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/01_v2_live.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 5 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > t/02_v3_live.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 8 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 1-2 > Non-zero exit status: 2 > Files=3, Tests=14, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.27 cusr > 0.03 csys = 0.34 CPU) > Result: FAIL