Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Pod-Coverage CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 4157
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Pod-Coverage

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: mat [...] FreeBSD.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Important
Broken in: 0.12
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Broken on amd64
Hi, Pod::Coverage has been added to the FreeBSD ports collection, and it fails to build on an amd64 box with the following logs : http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/p5-Pod-Coverage-0.12.log It may not Pod-Coverage fault but perl's, but I'm a bit dubious because lot of other XS perl ports (and perl) work pretty well on it.
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:54:14 +0100
From: Richard Clamp <richardc [...] unixbeard.net>
To: bug-Pod-Coverage [...] rt.cpan.org
Subject: Re: [cpan #4157] Broken on amd64
RT-Send-Cc:
Guest via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> Hi, > > Pod::Coverage has been added to the FreeBSD ports collection, and it fails to build on an amd64 box with the following logs : > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/p5-Pod-Coverage-0.12.log > > It may not Pod-Coverage fault but perl's, but I'm a bit dubious because lot of other XS perl ports (and perl) work pretty well on it.
I think it's a fault in Module::Build, which Pod::Coverage now uses to build itself. Most of the other XS ports will be using ExtUtils::MakeMaker and so compile slightly differently. Please supply the output of perl -V on your system to confirm this hunch, I'm most interested in the lines that refer to dlflags (ccdlflags, cccdlflags, and lddlflags) but the full output would be usful in case I'm not on the right track. Thanks. -- Richard Clamp <richardc@unixbeard.net>
My answer is still no. -- Richard Clamp <richardc@unixbeard.net>