Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the BSD-Resource CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 4115
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: BSD-Resource

People
Owner: JHI [...] cpan.org
Requestors: sreeji_k [...] yahoo.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: 1.23
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: make test fails for get/setpriority
make test fails. Following is the complete output: $ make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /tdev/bin/perl5.8.1 "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/getpriority....Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at t/getpriority.t line 20. Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at t/getpriority.t line 22. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at t/getpriority.t line 27. Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at t/getpriority.t line 29. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at t/getpriority.t line 34. Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at t/getpriority.t line 36. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay t/getrlimit......ok t/getrusage......ok t/setpriority....Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at t/setpriority.t line 13. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at t/setpriority.t line 19. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at t/setpriority.t line 28. This happens only on SunOS 5.6 $ uname -a SunOS ap555sun 5.6 Generic_105181-34 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 The code works fine on the other 2 servers I tested - Linux 2.4.9-e.18 (RHAS 2.1) and Solaris 9 (SunOS 5.9). The tests fail because getpriority() returns undef. In C code, it returns -1 with errno set to 3 (ESRCH). I wrote the following test program to check: $ cat tst.c #include <sys/resource.h> #include <errno.h> main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int prio; id_t process = (id_t) 0; errno = 0; prio = getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, process); printf("prio = %d, errno = %d\n", prio, errno); if (errno) perror("error: getpriority() "); else printf("getpriority() returned %d\n", prio); } $ rm -f tst && make tst && ./tst cc -L/usr/local/lib -o tst tst.c prio = -1, errno = 3 error: getpriority() : No such process I've confirmed that the test program works on Solaris 9 (prio is returned as 0). A truss shows the following: truss -o t.out ./tst $ cat t.out execve("./tst", 0xEFFFF8F0, 0xEFFFF8F8) argc = 1 resolvepath("/usr/lib/ld.so.1", "/usr/lib/ld.so.1", 1023) = 16 open("/var/ld/ld.config", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT open("/tdev/oracle/9.2.0.4/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT open("/tdev/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT open("/usr/openwin/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT open("/usr/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, 0xEFFFEFD4) = 0 mmap(0x00000000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xEF7B0000 mmap(0x00000000, 712704, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xEF680000 mmap(0xEF724000, 30500, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, , 606208) = 0xEF724000 open("/dev/zero", O_RDONLY) = 4 mmap(0xEF72C000, 4408, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 4 0) = 0xEF72C000 munmap(0xEF716000, 57344) = 0 mmap(0x00000000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 4, 0) = 0xE7A0000 memcntl(0xEF680000, 101964, MC_ADVISE, 0x0003, 0, 0) = 0 close(3) = 0 open("/tdev/oracle/9.2.0.4/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT open("/tdev/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT open("/usr/openwin/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT open("/usr/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, 0xEFFFEFD4) = 0 mmap(0xEF7B0000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0) = 0xEFB0000 close(3) = 0 open("/usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/libc_psr.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, 0xEFFFEE34) = 0 mmap(0x00000000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xEF790000 mmap(0x00000000, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xEF780000 close(3) = 0 close(4) = 0 munmap(0xEF790000, 8192) = 0 priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 0, 0xEFFFF804) = 4 priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 3, 0xEFFFF7E0) Err#3 ESRCH priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 0, 0xEFFFF804) = 4 priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 3, 0xEFFFF7E0) Err#3 ESRCH ioctl(1, TCGETA, 0xEFFFE974) = 0 write(1, " p r i o = - 1 , e".., 21) = 21 brk(0x00020990) = 0 brk(0x00022990) = 0 write(2, " e r r o r : g e t p r".., 21) = 21 write(2, " : ", 2) = 2 write(2, " N o s u c h p r o c".., 15) = 15 write(2, "\n", 1) = 1 llseek(0, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 8375 _exit(1) ---------------- I use perl5.8.1
[guest - Wed Oct 15 12:29:12 2003]: Show quoted text
> make test fails. Following is the complete output: > $ make test > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /tdev/bin/perl5.8.1 "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" > "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t > t/getpriority....Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or > string at t/getpriority.t line 20. > Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at t/getpriority.t > line 22. > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > t/getpriority.t line 27. > Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at t/getpriority.t > line 29. > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > t/getpriority.t line 34. > Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at t/getpriority.t > line 36. > FAILED tests 1-3 > Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay > t/getrlimit......ok > t/getrusage......ok > t/setpriority....Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or > string at t/setpriority.t line 13. > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > t/setpriority.t line 19. > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > t/setpriority.t line 28. > > This happens only on SunOS 5.6 > $ uname -a > SunOS ap555sun 5.6 Generic_105181-34 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 > > The code works fine on the other 2 servers I tested - Linux 2.4.9- > e.18 (RHAS 2.1) and Solaris 9 (SunOS 5.9). > The tests fail because getpriority() returns undef. In C code, it > returns > -1 with errno set to 3 (ESRCH). > I wrote the following test program to check: > $ cat tst.c > #include <sys/resource.h> > #include <errno.h> > main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > int prio; > id_t process = (id_t) 0; > errno = 0; > prio = getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, process); > printf("prio = %d, errno = %d\n", prio, errno); > if (errno) > perror("error: getpriority() "); > else > printf("getpriority() returned %d\n", prio); > } > > $ rm -f tst && make tst && ./tst > cc -L/usr/local/lib -o tst tst.c > prio = -1, errno = 3 > error: getpriority() : No such process > > I've confirmed that the test program works on Solaris 9 (prio is > returned as 0). > A truss shows the following: > truss -o t.out ./tst > $ cat t.out > execve("./tst", 0xEFFFF8F0, 0xEFFFF8F8) argc = 1 > resolvepath("/usr/lib/ld.so.1", "/usr/lib/ld.so.1", 1023) = 16 > open("/var/ld/ld.config", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT > open("/tdev/oracle/9.2.0.4/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT > open("/tdev/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT > open("/usr/openwin/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT > open("/usr/lib/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3 > fstat(3, 0xEFFFEFD4) = 0 > mmap(0x00000000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = > 0xEF7B0000 > mmap(0x00000000, 712704, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = > 0xEF680000 > mmap(0xEF724000, 30500, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, > MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, , 606208) = 0xEF724000 > open("/dev/zero", O_RDONLY) = 4 > mmap(0xEF72C000, 4408, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, > MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 4 0) = 0xEF72C000 > munmap(0xEF716000, 57344) = 0 > mmap(0x00000000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 4, > 0) = 0xE7A0000 > memcntl(0xEF680000, 101964, MC_ADVISE, 0x0003, 0, 0) = 0 > close(3) = 0 > open("/tdev/oracle/9.2.0.4/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT > open("/tdev/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT > open("/usr/openwin/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT > open("/usr/lib/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3 > fstat(3, 0xEFFFEFD4) = 0 > mmap(0xEF7B0000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, > 0) = 0xEFB0000 > close(3) = 0 > open("/usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/libc_psr.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3 > fstat(3, 0xEFFFEE34) = 0 > mmap(0x00000000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = > 0xEF790000 > mmap(0x00000000, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = > 0xEF780000 > close(3) = 0 > close(4) = 0 > munmap(0xEF790000, 8192) = 0 > priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 0, 0xEFFFF804) = 4 > priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 3, 0xEFFFF7E0) Err#3 ESRCH > priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 0, 0xEFFFF804) = 4 > priocntlsys(1, 0xEFFFF70C, 3, 0xEFFFF7E0) Err#3 ESRCH > ioctl(1, TCGETA, 0xEFFFE974) = 0 > write(1, " p r i o = - 1 , e".., 21) = 21 > brk(0x00020990) = 0 > brk(0x00022990) = 0 > write(2, " e r r o r : g e t p r".., 21) = 21 > write(2, " : ", 2) = 2 > write(2, " N o s u c h p r o c".., 15) = 15 > write(2, "\n", 1) = 1 > llseek(0, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 8375 > _exit(1) > > ---------------- > I use perl5.8.1
Probably I miss a patch from Sun? Hmm... probably I should search sun.com. Google did not return anything useful so far.
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:35:43 +0300
From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi [...] iki.fi>
To: Guest via RT <bug-BSD-Resource [...] rt.cpan.org>
CC: "AdminCc of cpan Ticket #4115": ;
Subject: Re: [cpan #4115] make test fails for get/setpriority
RT-Send-Cc:
Please use truss to see what is the second argument to ?etpriority. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:37:40 +0300
From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi [...] iki.fi>
To: Guest via RT <bug-BSD-Resource [...] rt.cpan.org>
CC: "AdminCc of cpan Ticket #4115": ;
Subject: Re: [cpan #4115] make test fails for get/setpriority
RT-Send-Cc:
I simply suggest first installing the latest patch cluster for this Solaris release. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:32:56 +0200
From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi [...] iki.fi>
To: Guest via RT <bug-BSD-Resource [...] rt.cpan.org>
CC: "AdminCc of cpan Ticket #4115": ;
Subject: Re: [cpan #4115] make test fails for get/setpriority
RT-Send-Cc:
Hi, any news on this? -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen