Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Lucene CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 35519
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: Lucene
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: vfelix [...] som.umaryland.edu
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Tue Apr 29 13:29:09 2008 vfelix [...] som.umaryland.edu - Ticket created
Subject: Problem on x86_64
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:28:43 -0400
To: <bug-Lucene [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: "Felix, Victor" <vfelix [...] som.umaryland.edu>
Had a difficult time installing this on Red Hat Enterprise 5 on a 64-architecture (x86_64). I think the problem is in the Makefile.PL, and that the lib64 directory is not one of the directories searched for the clucene config file. Once I made the adjustment, the installer worked fine. Perhaps the Makefile.PL should detect whether we are on x86_64 and add the appropriate directories dynamically... -Victor
  Tue May 27 12:52:42 2008 thomas [...] careerjet.com - Correspondence added
Subject: CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64
From: tbusch [...] cpan.org
Dear Victor, if you add the following line to Makefile.PL, can you confirm that it works: "linux_x86_64" => ["/usr/include", "/usr/lib64"], If yes, I will add this to the next release. Thomas. On Tue Apr 29 13:29:09 2008, vfelix@som.umaryland.edu wrote: Show quoted text
> Had a difficult time installing this on Red Hat Enterprise 5 on a 64- > architecture (x86_64). I think the problem is in the Makefile.PL, > and that the lib64 directory is not one of the directories searched > for the clucene config file. Once I made the adjustment, the > installer worked fine. Perhaps the Makefile.PL should detect > whether we are on x86_64 and add the appropriate directories > dynamically... > > -Victor
  Tue May 27 12:52:43 2008 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Tue May 27 14:12:06 2008 vfelix [...] som.umaryland.edu - Correspondence added
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 14:11:37 -0400
To: <bug-Lucene [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: "Felix, Victor" <vfelix [...] som.umaryland.edu>
Yes, that's what I did to get it to work, however there were also problems with the -clucene flag on certain platforms like centos. Sorry, I don't have any more information at the moment about it, but I'll send it along if I get more information... -Victor Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Busch via RT [mailto:bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:53 PM To: Felix, Victor Subject: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64 <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > Dear Victor, if you add the following line to Makefile.PL, can you confirm that it works: "linux_x86_64" => ["/usr/include", "/usr/lib64"], If yes, I will add this to the next release. Thomas. On Tue Apr 29 13:29:09 2008, vfelix@som.umaryland.edu wrote:
> Had a difficult time installing this on Red Hat Enterprise 5 on a 64- > architecture (x86_64). I think the problem is in the Makefile.PL, > and that the lib64 directory is not one of the directories searched > for the clucene config file. Once I made the adjustment, the > installer worked fine. Perhaps the Makefile.PL should detect > whether we are on x86_64 and add the appropriate directories > dynamically... > > -Victor
  Tue May 27 14:25:01 2008 tbusch [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 20:24:45 +0200
To: bug-Lucene [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Thomas Busch <tbusch [...] cpan.org>
ok. I will add this line for now. If you have more info about CentOS please let me know. It should be the same problem though as CentOS is just unbranded RedHat Enterprise. Thomas. Quoting "Felix, Victor via RT" <bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org>: Show quoted text
> > Queue: Lucene > Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > > > Yes, that's what I did to get it to work, however there were also > problems with the -clucene flag on certain platforms like centos. > Sorry, I don't have any more information at the moment about it, but > I'll send it along if I get more information... > > -Victor > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Busch via RT [mailto:bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:53 PM > To: Felix, Victor > Subject: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64 > > > <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > > > Dear Victor, > > if you add the following line to Makefile.PL, can you confirm > that it works: > > "linux_x86_64" => ["/usr/include", "/usr/lib64"], > > If yes, I will add this to the next release. > > Thomas. > > On Tue Apr 29 13:29:09 2008, vfelix@som.umaryland.edu wrote:
>> Had a difficult time installing this on Red Hat Enterprise 5 on a 64- >> architecture (x86_64). I think the problem is in the Makefile.PL, >> and that the lib64 directory is not one of the directories searched >> for the clucene config file. Once I made the adjustment, the >> installer worked fine. Perhaps the Makefile.PL should detect >> whether we are on x86_64 and add the appropriate directories >> dynamically... >> >> -Victor
> > > > >
  Tue May 27 14:47:47 2008 tbusch [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 20:47:34 +0200
To: bug-Lucene [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Thomas Busch <tbusch [...] cpan.org>
one question though, what is the value of $^0 on your x86_64 system ? Thomas. Show quoted text
> > Queue: Lucene > Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > > > ok. I will add this line for now. If you have more info > about CentOS please let me know. It should be the same > problem though as CentOS is just unbranded RedHat > Enterprise. > > Thomas. > > Quoting "Felix, Victor via RT" <bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org>:
>> >> Queue: Lucene >> Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > >> >> Yes, that's what I did to get it to work, however there were also >> problems with the -clucene flag on certain platforms like centos. >> Sorry, I don't have any more information at the moment about it, but >> I'll send it along if I get more information... >> >> -Victor >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thomas Busch via RT [mailto:bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:53 PM >> To: Felix, Victor >> Subject: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64 >> >> >> <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > >> >> Dear Victor, >> >> if you add the following line to Makefile.PL, can you confirm >> that it works: >> >> "linux_x86_64" => ["/usr/include", "/usr/lib64"], >> >> If yes, I will add this to the next release. >> >> Thomas. >> >> On Tue Apr 29 13:29:09 2008, vfelix@som.umaryland.edu wrote:
>>> Had a difficult time installing this on Red Hat Enterprise 5 on a 64- >>> architecture (x86_64). I think the problem is in the Makefile.PL, >>> and that the lib64 directory is not one of the directories searched >>> for the clucene config file. Once I made the adjustment, the >>> installer worked fine. Perhaps the Makefile.PL should detect >>> whether we are on x86_64 and add the appropriate directories >>> dynamically... >>> >>> -Victor
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > > >
  Tue May 27 17:16:32 2008 vfelix [...] som.umaryland.edu - Correspondence added
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 17:16:07 -0400
To: <bug-Lucene [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: "Felix, Victor" <vfelix [...] som.umaryland.edu>
Thomas, I suspect you meant with a captital o: perl -e 'print "$^O\n";' linux But here it is with a zero: perl -e 'print "$^0\n";' STDOUT_TOP0 Also, we've been seing segfaults in certain situations when we try to retrieve result sets greater than 100 in size. Any idea what that might be about? We've been able to code around it by creating new analyzers, sorters, etc, each time, but it's not very elegant... I can try to create a test case for you if you think it would be helpful... -Victor Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: tbusch@cpan.org via RT [mailto:bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:48 PM To: Felix, Victor Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64 <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > one question though, what is the value of $^0 on your x86_64 system ? Thomas.
> > Queue: Lucene > Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > > > ok. I will add this line for now. If you have more info > about CentOS please let me know. It should be the same > problem though as CentOS is just unbranded RedHat > Enterprise. > > Thomas. > > Quoting "Felix, Victor via RT" <bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org>:
>> >> Queue: Lucene >> Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > >> >> Yes, that's what I did to get it to work, however there were also >> problems with the -clucene flag on certain platforms like centos. >> Sorry, I don't have any more information at the moment about it, but >> I'll send it along if I get more information... >> >> -Victor >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thomas Busch via RT [mailto:bug-Lucene@rt.cpan.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:53 PM >> To: Felix, Victor >> Subject: [rt.cpan.org #35519] CPAN Lucene -- Problem on x86_64 >> >> >> <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35519 > >> >> Dear Victor, >> >> if you add the following line to Makefile.PL, can you confirm >> that it works: >> >> "linux_x86_64" => ["/usr/include", "/usr/lib64"], >> >> If yes, I will add this to the next release. >> >> Thomas. >> >> On Tue Apr 29 13:29:09 2008, vfelix@som.umaryland.edu wrote:
>>> Had a difficult time installing this on Red Hat Enterprise 5 on a 64- >>> architecture (x86_64). I think the problem is in the Makefile.PL, >>> and that the lib64 directory is not one of the directories searched >>> for the clucene config file. Once I made the adjustment, the >>> installer worked fine. Perhaps the Makefile.PL should detect >>> whether we are on x86_64 and add the appropriate directories >>> dynamically... >>> >>> -Victor
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > > >