Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Jifty CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 35392
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Jifty

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: li.meifang [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: maybe bug
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:09:28 +0800
To: bug-Jifty [...] rt.cpan.org
From: "李妹芳" <li.meifang [...] gmail.com>
Hi, I am trying to install Jifty from CPAN (Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz<http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SA/SARTAK/Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz>). I take everything as default, but there are such problems ====================== make: *** [test_dynamic] 错误 255 SARTAK/Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK //hint// to see the cpan-testers results for installing this module, try: reports SARTAK/Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz Running make install make test had returned bad status, won't install without force Failed during this command: SARTAK/Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz : make_test NO ================================ So, I wonder is there anything maybe wrong. Thanks for taking your time. -- Best Regards, Meifang Li
On Thu Apr 24 23:10:06 2008, li.meifang@gmail.com wrote: Show quoted text
> Hi, > > I am trying to install Jifty from CPAN > (Jifty- > 0.80408.tar.gz<http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SA/SARTAK/
Jifty- Show quoted text
> 0.80408.tar.gz>). > I take everything as default, but there are such problems > ====================== > > make: *** [test_dynamic] 错误 255 > SARTAK/Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz > /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK > //hint// to see the cpan-testers results for installing this module, > try: > reports SARTAK/Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz > Running make install > make test had returned bad status, won't install without force > Failed during this command: > SARTAK/Jifty-0.80408.tar.gz : make_test NO > > ================================ > > So, I wonder is there anything maybe wrong. > > Thanks for taking your time. > >
Hello, It looks like you're failing some tests. Could you give us more output? (The entire command's output is fine). Thanks, Shawn