Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the POE-API-Peek CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 35129
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: POE-API-Peek

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: ntyni [...] iki.fi
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Important
Broken in: 1.0802
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Test failures with POE 1.000
Hi, as seen in Debian bug #476011 <http://bugs.debian.org/476011> and CPAN test reports, t/07-kernel.t fails with the recently released POE 1.000: Show quoted text
> t/07-kernel........ > # Failed test 'event_list() returns populated hashref' > # in t/07-kernel.t at line 54. > > # Failed test 'event_list() returns correct list of sessions and events' > # in t/07-kernel.t at line 58. > # Structures begin differing at: > # $got->{2} = Does not exist > # $expected->{2} = ARRAY(0x849a2d8) > # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 11.
Please consider looking into this. Thanks for your work on POE-API-Peek, -- Niko Tyni (Debian Perl Group) ntyni@debian.org
From: ntyni [...] iki.fi
On Wed Apr 16 15:04:55 2008, ntyni@iki.fi wrote: Show quoted text
> Hi, > > as seen in Debian bug #476011 <http://bugs.debian.org/476011> and CPAN > test reports, t/07-kernel.t fails with the recently released POE 1.000:
Update: this happens because $POE::Kernel::poe_kernel->[KR_SESSIONS] is not initialized anymore. I have opened ticket #35143 in the POE queue about this. Cheers, -- Niko Tyni (Debian Perl Group) ntyni@debian.org
my tests seem to indicate that this is all better now. can you confirm? (sorry for not replying sooner. this email got dropped and I don't often check the web interface.)
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #35129] Test failures with POE 1.000
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:42:41 +0300
To: sungo via RT <bug-POE-API-Peek [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Niko Tyni <ntyni [...] iki.fi>
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:53:16PM -0400, sungo via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> > <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35129 > > > my tests seem to indicate that this is all better now. can you confirm? > > (sorry for not replying sooner. this email got dropped and I don't often check the web interface.)
My turn to apologise, no idea why I overlooked this. Yes, all seems to be fine with POE-1.0001. Feel free to close the ticket. -- Niko Tyni ntyni@debian.org
resolving by request