Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Regexp-Common CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 3281
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Regexp-Common

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: muenalan [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: 2.113
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: [perl5.8.0/win32] *Regexp::Common::URI::scheme* name in Regexp::Common::URI does not exist
When visiting the site/lib/Regexp/Common/URI dir there is no such *.pod|pm file, but RFC1035.pm RFC1738.pm RFC1808.pm RFC2384.pm RFC2396.pm RFC2806.pm fax.pm file.pm ftp.pm gopher.pm http.pm news.pm pop.pm prospero.pm tel.pm telnet.pm tv.pm wais.pm
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:13:52 +0200
From: Abigail <regexp-common [...] abigail.nl>
To: Guest via RT <bug-Regexp-Common [...] rt.cpan.org>
Subject: Re: [cpan #3281] [perl5.8.0/win32] *Regexp::Common::URI::scheme* name in Regexp::Common::URI does not exist
RT-Send-Cc:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 05:43:44AM -0400, Guest via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> > This message about Regexp-Common was sent to you by guest <> via rt.cpan.org > > Full context and any attached attachments can be found at: > <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3281 > > > When visiting the site/lib/Regexp/Common/URI dir there is no such *.pod|pm file, but > > RFC1035.pm > RFC1738.pm > RFC1808.pm > RFC2384.pm > RFC2396.pm > RFC2806.pm > fax.pm > file.pm > ftp.pm > gopher.pm > http.pm > news.pm > pop.pm > prospero.pm > tel.pm > telnet.pm > tv.pm > wais.pm
Uhm, yes. It's supposed to be that way. What makes you think there is something wrong? Abigail
[guest - Mon Aug 18 05:43:44 2003]: Show quoted text
> When visiting the site/lib/Regexp/Common/URI dir there is no such > *.pod|pm file, but
Please delete this ticket. I am an idiot. Now after reading Regexp::Common::URI pod twice i understand: *Regexp::Common::URI::scheme* 'scheme' is a placeholder. I puzzled because i did an exact 'perldoc Regexp::Common::URI::scheme' in the shell and wondered that there is no manual page. But let me suggest a more foolproof sentence like "Each is documented in its *Regexp::Common::URI::<scheme>* manual page, where <scheme> is one of fax, file, ftp, gopher, http, news (for NTTP), tel, telnet, tv or wais. Original was: "Patterns for the following URIs are supported: fax, file, FTP, gopher, HTTP, news, NTTP, tel, telnet, tv and WAIS. Each is documented in the *Regexp::Common::URI::scheme*, manual page, for the appropriate scheme (in lowercase), except for *NNTP* URIs which are found in *Regexp::Common::URI::news*." Greetings, Murat