Hi there:
That's correct: Document.pm and TextBlock.pm are both distributed under
the same terms as Perl (GPL+Artistic). Let me know if you need more
information
--Shawn
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, David Paleino via RT wrote:
Show quoted text>
> Tue Jan 15 02:56:42 2008: Request 32319 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by d.paleino@gmail.com
> Queue: PostScript
> Subject: Missing copyright information
> Broken in: 0.06
> Severity: Important
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: d.paleino@gmail.com
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32319 >
>
>
> Hi,
> I'm packaging PostScript for the Debian GNU/Linux distribution. I've
> encountered some problems in your module; in fact, Document.pm and
> TextBlock.pm are missing any copyright information. I assume that they
> are distributed under the same license as Perl (GPL + Artistic), but to
> avoid any rejection from Debian repositories, it would be better if you
> specify it. You can make a new release, or, better, just state what the
> license is in this bugreport. It will be referenced in case of rejection
> from the repositories.
>
> Have a nice day,
> David Paleino
> Debian Perl Team
>
--
S h a w n P W a l l a c e
http://www.as220.org/shawn/
115 Empire St Providence RI
