Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Lolcats CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 31845
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: Lolcats
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: mail [...] memowe.de
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: 0.01
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Mon Dec 24 04:40:38 2007 mail [...] memowe.de - Ticket created
Subject: b0rken documentation and some other issues
Hi Andy, thanks for your nice module Lolcats! But i found some issues: - no need for a shebang line in a module - the NAME section should be Lolcats, because the name of your module is Lolcats (not Lolcats::lolify) - in your documentation are Lolfy, Lolify and lolify, but only Lolify is correct. - some POD sections are doubled So i wrote a patch for this but i eated it ;-). Also your tests are "not implemented". I think your module would be much better with consistent documentation and tests (f/e to check if my patch works)... Thanks in advance, kind regards Mirko Westermeier (MEMOWE)
  Mon Dec 24 05:24:12 2007 andy [...] ajd.me.uk - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #31845] b0rken documentation and some other issues
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:23:29 +0000
To: bug-Lolcats [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Andy Dixon <andy [...] ajd.me.uk>
Mirko Westermeier via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> Mon Dec 24 04:40:38 2007: Request 31845 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by MEMOWE > Queue: Lolcats > Subject: b0rken documentation and some other issues > Broken in: 0.01 > Severity: Normal > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: mail@memowe.de > Status: new > Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=31845 > > > > Hi Andy, > > thanks for your nice module Lolcats! But i found some issues: > > - no need for a shebang line in a module > > - the NAME section should be Lolcats, because the name of your module is > Lolcats (not Lolcats::lolify) > > - in your documentation are Lolfy, Lolify and lolify, but only Lolify is > correct. > > - some POD sections are doubled > > So i wrote a patch for this but i eated it ;-). Also your tests are "not > implemented". I think your module would be much better with consistent > documentation and tests (f/e to check if my patch works)... > > Thanks in advance, kind regards > > Mirko Westermeier (MEMOWE) >
Hello Mirko, The module is being deleted, and I will be updating my other module with the proper tests in the new year.. Thanks for the heads up! Andy
  Mon Dec 24 05:24:16 2007 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'