Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the Test-Simple CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 26853
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Test-Simple
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: LGODDARD [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Unimportant
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007 LGODDARD [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: Error in counting tests
RT is rubbish. It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which is the latest on my local CPANs. Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes ok 3 not ok 4 - no warnings # Failed test 'no warnings' # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. # There were 1 warning(s) # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 # 1..4 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn Test::More->VERSION' 0.7 at -e line 1. This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have barbled test output, with test y answering after test x. If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon as we can see it here. Thanks, Lee
  Fri May 04 05:51:32 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Queue changed from Test-More to Test-Simple
  Fri May 04 06:08:51 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: Show quoted text
> RT is rubbish.
Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated hosting? Show quoted text
> It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see > that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which > is the latest on my local CPANs.
That's because you reported in the wrong queue. Test-More is a leftover from when the distribution was called Test-More. Test-Simple is the correct queue. I'm trying to get that old queue shut down as you're not the first to make that mistake. And its 0.70. Show quoted text
> Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: > > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl > ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; > ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes > ok 3 > not ok 4 - no warnings > # Failed test 'no warnings' > # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. > # There were 1 warning(s) > # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' > # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. > # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH > (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 > # > 1..4 > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn > Test::More->VERSION' > 0.7 at -e line 1. > > This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange > circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have > barbled test output, with test y answering after test x.
threads? forking? Show quoted text
> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon > as we can see it here.
There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2 and test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with the count. What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl would be helpful.
  Fri May 04 06:16:08 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: Show quoted text
> RT is rubbish.
Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated hosting? Show quoted text
> It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see > that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which > is the latest on my local CPANs.
That's because you reported in the wrong queue. Test-More is a leftover from when the distribution was called Test-More. Test-Simple is the correct queue. I'm trying to get that old queue shut down as you're not the first to make that mistake. And its 0.70. Show quoted text
> Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: > > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl > ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; > ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes > ok 3 > not ok 4 - no warnings > # Failed test 'no warnings' > # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. > # There were 1 warning(s) > # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' > # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. > # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH > (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 > # > 1..4 > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn > Test::More->VERSION' > 0.7 at -e line 1. > > This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange > circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have > barbled test output, with test y answering after test x.
threads? forking? Show quoted text
> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon > as we can see it here.
There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2 and test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with the count. What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl would be helpful.
  Fri May 04 06:17:55 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: Show quoted text
> RT is rubbish.
Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated hosting? Show quoted text
> It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see > that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which > is the latest on my local CPANs.
That's because you reported in the wrong queue. Test-More is a leftover from when the distribution was called Test-More. Test-Simple is the correct queue. I'm trying to get that old queue shut down as you're not the first to make that mistake. And its 0.70. Show quoted text
> Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: > > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl > ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; > ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes > ok 3 > not ok 4 - no warnings > # Failed test 'no warnings' > # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. > # There were 1 warning(s) > # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' > # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. > # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH > (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 > # > 1..4 > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn > Test::More->VERSION' > 0.7 at -e line 1. > > This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange > circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have > barbled test output, with test y answering after test x.
threads? forking? Show quoted text
> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon > as we can see it here.
There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2 and test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with the count. What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl would be helpful.
  Fri May 04 06:18:45 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: Show quoted text
> RT is rubbish.
Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated hosting? Show quoted text
> It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see > that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which > is the latest on my local CPANs.
That's because you reported in the wrong queue. Test-More is a leftover from when the distribution was called Test-More. Test-Simple is the correct queue. I'm trying to get that old queue shut down as you're not the first to make that mistake. And its 0.70. Show quoted text
> Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: > > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl > ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; > ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes > ok 3 > not ok 4 - no warnings > # Failed test 'no warnings' > # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. > # There were 1 warning(s) > # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' > # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. > # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH > (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 > # > 1..4 > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn > Test::More->VERSION' > 0.7 at -e line 1. > > This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange > circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have > barbled test output, with test y answering after test x.
threads? forking? Show quoted text
> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon > as we can see it here.
There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2 and test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with the count. What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl would be helpful.
  Fri May 04 06:21:34 2007 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Fri May 04 06:26:07 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: Show quoted text
> RT is rubbish.
Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated hosting? Show quoted text
> It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see > that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which > is the latest on my local CPANs.
That's because you reported in the wrong queue. Test-More is a leftover from when the distribution was called Test-More. Test-Simple is the correct queue. I'm trying to get that old queue shut down as you're not the first to make that mistake. And its 0.70. Show quoted text
> Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: > > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl > ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; > ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes > ok 3 > not ok 4 - no warnings > # Failed test 'no warnings' > # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. > # There were 1 warning(s) > # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' > # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. > # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH > (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 > # > 1..4 > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn > Test::More->VERSION' > 0.7 at -e line 1. > > This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange > circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have > barbled test output, with test y answering after test x.
threads? forking? Show quoted text
> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon > as we can see it here.
There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2 and test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with the count. What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl would be helpful.
  Fri May 04 06:29:06 2007 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Fri May 04 06:32:51 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: Show quoted text
> RT is rubbish.
Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated hosting? Show quoted text
> It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see > that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which > is the latest on my local CPANs.
That's because you reported in the wrong queue. Test-More is a leftover from when the distribution was called Test-More. Test-Simple is the correct queue. I'm trying to get that old queue shut down as you're not the first to make that mistake. And its 0.70. Show quoted text
> Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: > > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl > ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; > ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes > ok 3 > not ok 4 - no warnings > # Failed test 'no warnings' > # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. > # There were 1 warning(s) > # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' > # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. > # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH > (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 > # > 1..4 > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn > Test::More->VERSION' > 0.7 at -e line 1. > > This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange > circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have > barbled test output, with test y answering after test x.
threads? forking? Show quoted text
> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon > as we can see it here.
There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2 and test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with the count. What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl would be helpful.
  Fri May 04 06:45:57 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: Show quoted text
> RT is rubbish.
Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated hosting? Show quoted text
> It took five minutes to get to this page, and now I see > that the 'Broken In'/'Fixed In' fields do not show version 0.07, which > is the latest on my local CPANs.
That's because you reported in the wrong queue. Test-More is a leftover from when the distribution was called Test-More. Test-Simple is the correct queue. I'm trying to get that old queue shut down as you're not the first to make that mistake. And its 0.70. Show quoted text
> Anyway, the bug is shown below better than I can explain it: > > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl 060_attr.pl > ok 1 - use CTT::Model::Attributes; > ok 2 - The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes > ok 3 > not ok 4 - no warnings > # Failed test 'no warnings' > # at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 45. > # There were 1 warning(s) > # Previous test 2 'The object isa CTT::Model::Attributes' > # Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at ../lib/CTT/Model/Attributes.pm line 59. > # CTT::Model::Attributes::add('CTT::Model::Attributes=HASH > (0x81619c4)', 1) called at 060_attr.pl line 21 > # > 1..4 > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 4. > lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt/trunk/t$ perl -MTest::More -e 'warn > Test::More->VERSION' > 0.7 at -e line 1. > > This might also explain why I also sometimes, under strange > circumstances too complex to reduce at present, get told that I have > barbled test output, with test y answering after test x.
threads? forking? Show quoted text
> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as soon > as we can see it here.
There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2 and test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with the count. What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl would be helpful.
  Fri May 04 07:07:47 2007 LGoddard [...] UK.Advertising.com - Correspondence added
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #26853] Error in counting tests
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:05:40 +0100
To: <bug-Test-Simple [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: "Lee Goddard" <LGoddard [...] UK.Advertising.com>
Show quoted text
> <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=26853 >
E-mail reply because that URI gives a 500 error. Show quoted text
> > On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: > > RT is rubbish.
> > Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free > service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated > hosting?
rt.cpan.org generally doesn't work. Not a great advert for RT. I don't install it anywhere anymore, and don't let my sysadmins do it either. Sad. Show quoted text
> > threads? forking?
perl -V at the end of this mail, sorry I forgot it. Test script uses no threads or forks. Show quoted text
> > If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as
soon Show quoted text
> > as we can see it here.
> > There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a > proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning > generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2
and ? test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with ? the count. Show quoted text
> > What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl
? would be helpful. Oh no it wouldn't, I'm afraid, but if I keep seeing this I shall post a reduced, illustrative example. Thanks for taking the time to reply. Lee lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt2/trunk/t$ perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 4) configuration: Platform: osname=linux, osvers=2.6.15.6, archname=i386-linux-thread-multi uname='linux ernie 2.6.15.6 #1 thu mar 16 13:11:55 est 2006 i686 gnulinux ' config_args='-Dusethreads -Duselargefiles -Dccflags=-DDEBIAN -Dcccdlflags=-fPIC -Darchname=i386-linux -Dprefix=/usr -Dprivlib=/usr/share/perl/5.8 -Darchlib=/usr/lib/perl/5.8 -Dvendorprefix=/usr -Dvendorlib=/usr/share/perl5 -Dvendorarch=/usr/lib/perl5 -Dsiteprefix=/usr/local -Dsitelib=/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 -Dsitearch=/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 -Dman1dir=/usr/share/man/man1 -Dman3dir=/usr/share/man/man3 -Dsiteman1dir=/usr/local/man/man1 -Dsiteman3dir=/usr/local/man/man3 -Dman1ext=1 -Dman3ext=3perl -Dpager=/usr/bin/sensible-pager -Uafs -Ud_csh -Uusesfio -Uusenm -Duseshrplib -Dlibperl=libperl.so.5.8.4 -Dd_dosuid -des' hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define usethreads=define use5005threads=undef useithreads=define usemultiplicity=define useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef Compiler: cc='cc', ccflags ='-D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64', optimize='-O2', cppflags='-D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include' ccversion='', gccversion='3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)', gccosandvers='' intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=1234 d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=12 ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t', lseeksize=8 alignbytes=4, prototype=define Linker and Libraries: ld='cc', ldflags =' -L/usr/local/lib' libpth=/usr/local/lib /lib /usr/lib libs=-lgdbm -lgdbm_compat -ldb -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc -lcrypt perllibs=-ldl -lm -lpthread -lc -lcrypt libc=/lib/libc-2.3.2.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.4 gnulibc_version='2.3.2' Dynamic Linking: dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags='-Wl,-E' cccdlflags='-fPIC', lddlflags='-shared -L/usr/local/lib' Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT Built under linux Compiled at May 10 2006 03:55:26 @INC: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl . lgoddard@uk-sandbox:~/ctt2/trunk/t$

Message body is not shown because it is too large.

  Fri May 04 07:57:53 2007 schwern [...] pobox.com - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #26853] Error in counting tests
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 04:56:02 -0700
To: bug-Test-Simple [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Michael G Schwern <schwern [...] pobox.com>
Lee Goddard via RT wrote: Show quoted text
>>> On Tue May 01 09:24:14 2007, LGODDARD wrote: >>> RT is rubbish.
>> Correction: rt.cpan.org is rubbish. Best Practical hosts it as a free >> service for the community. Perhaps you could like to donate dedicated >> hosting?
> > rt.cpan.org generally doesn't work. Not a great advert for RT. I don't > install it anywhere anymore, and don't let my sysadmins do it either. > Sad.
You are correct, its not a great advert for RT. But YOU know better than to blame RT itself. rt.cpan.org is running on a spare dev box, not a dedicated machine, and maintained by volunteers. Do not confuse a bad implementation with a bad idea. Show quoted text
>>> If you need more info, pleaes get in touch. I'll update to 0.08 as
> soon
>>> as we can see it here.
>> There appears to be nothing wrong with the above. It seems to be a >> proper case of Test::NoWarnings failing because there is a warning >> generated by CTT::Model::Attributes::add() somewhere between test 2
> and > ? test 3. 4 tests run, 4 tests no planned at the end. No problem with > ? the count.
>> What did you do and what did you expect? The contents of 60_attr.pl
> ? would be helpful. > > Oh no it wouldn't, I'm afraid, but if I keep seeing this I shall post a > reduced, illustrative example.
Seeing what? So far there hasn't been any clear problem reported. What's the bug?
  Thu Nov 29 19:43:33 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'stalled'
  Thu Nov 29 19:43:50 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Severity Critical changed to Unimportant
  Thu Nov 29 20:10:38 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
We never did figure out what the actual bug here was. Your initial report looked like Test::More was working as expected.
  Thu Nov 29 20:11:20 2007 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'stalled' to 'open'
  Thu Nov 29 20:30:18 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'stalled'
  Fri Nov 30 07:48:07 2007 leeg1644 [...] leegoddard.net - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #26853] Error in counting tests
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:47:25 -0000 (UTC)
To: bug-Test-Simple [...] rt.cpan.org
From: leeg1644 [...] leegoddard.net
Show quoted text
> > <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=26853 > > > We never did figure out what the actual bug here was. Your initial > report looked like Test::More was working as expected.
We did not, since I no lnoger have the code to reproduce it. As previously mentioned, I shall re-submit if i re-encounter. And if I can remember to which queue you prefer to have it posted.
  Fri Nov 30 07:48:16 2007 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'stalled' to 'open'
  Fri Nov 30 20:21:46 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On Fri Nov 30 07:48:07 2007, leeg1644@leegoddard.net wrote: Show quoted text
> > > > <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=26853 > > > > > We never did figure out what the actual bug here was. Your initial > > report looked like Test::More was working as expected.
> > We did not, since I no lnoger have the code to reproduce it.
Ok, I'll close this up then. Show quoted text
> As previously mentioned, I shall re-submit if i re-encounter. And if I can > remember to which queue you prefer to have it posted.
The one that doesn't have a single bug in it named "Report bugs in Test-Simple instead!" ;)
  Fri Nov 30 20:22:11 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'
  Mon Dec 03 14:50:37 2007 London [...] LeeGoddard.net - Correspondence added
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #26853] Error in counting tests
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:04:07 +0000
To: bug-Test-Simple [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Lee Goddard <London [...] LeeGoddard.net>
Michael G Schwern via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=26853 > > > On Fri Nov 30 07:48:07 2007, leeg1644@leegoddard.net wrote:
>>> <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=26853 > >>> >>> We never did figure out what the actual bug here was. Your initial >>> report looked like Test::More was working as expected.
>> We did not, since I no lnoger have the code to reproduce it.
> > Ok, I'll close this up then.
Yes, please. Show quoted text
>> As previously mentioned, I shall re-submit if i re-encounter. And if I can >> remember to which queue you prefer to have it posted.
> > The one that doesn't have a single bug in it named "Report bugs in > Test-Simple instead!" ;)
If you're going to be like that, you should proof read. :p Thanks for your work, all the same. Lee
  Mon Dec 03 14:50:44 2007 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'resolved' to 'open'
  Mon Dec 03 19:22:38 2007 mschwern [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'