Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the GStreamer CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 21168
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: GStreamer

People
Owner: kaffeetisch [...] gmx.de
Requestors: cweyl [...] alumni.drew.edu
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: make test fails on GstValue.t
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:35:40 -0700
To: bug-GStreamer [...] rt.cpan.org
From: "Chris Weyl" <cweyl [...] alumni.drew.edu>

Message body is not shown because it is too large.

On Thu Aug 24 11:36:01 2006, cweyl@alumni.drew.edu wrote: Show quoted text
> t/GstValue.............. > # Failed test in t/GstValue.t at line 25. > # got: 'urgs, field_one=(int)[ 23, 42 ], field_two=(int){ 23, > 42 }, field_three=(int){ [ 23, 42 ] }, field_four=(GstDate)2001-09-08' > # expected: 'urgs, field_one=(int)[ 23, 42 ], field_two=(int){ 23, > 42 }, field_three=(int){ [ 23, 42 ] }, field_four=(GstDate)2001-09-09' > t/GstValue..............NOK 1 > # Failed test in t/GstValue.t at line 26. > # Structures begin differing at: > # $got->{fields}[3][2] = '999932400' > # $expected->{fields}[3][2] = '999986400' > # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 2.
This issue has also recently been reported to Bugzilla[1]. There, I posted a small patch to get more debug output[2]. It would be great if you too followed the instructions and posted your output. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348454 [2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348454#c15 -- Thanks, -Torsten
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #21168] make test fails on GstValue.t
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:06:17 -0700
To: bug-GStreamer [...] rt.cpan.org
From: "Chris Weyl" <cweyl [...] alumni.drew.edu>
On 8/24/06, Torsten Schönfeld via RT <bug-GStreamer@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> > <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=21168 > > > This issue has also recently been reported to Bugzilla[1]. There, I > posted a small patch to get more debug output[2]. It would be great if > you too followed the instructions and posted your output.
Not a problem, I'll take a look and report over there. For sanity's sake, would it be possible to note somewhere in the distribution itself (e.g. README) that bugs should be reported via gnome bugzilla and neither rt.cpan.org nor sf.net? I see now the "reporting bugs" on gtk2-perl.sf.net points right at bugzilla, but it'd be nice for it to be explicit in the package as well. Thanks :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia
On Thu Aug 24 12:06:32 2006, cweyl@alumni.drew.edu wrote: Show quoted text
> For sanity's sake, would it be possible to note somewhere in the > distribution itself (e.g. README) that bugs should be reported via > gnome bugzilla and neither rt.cpan.org nor sf.net? I see now the > "reporting bugs" on gtk2-perl.sf.net points right at bugzilla, but > it'd be nice for it to be explicit in the package as well.
Done now on HEAD of CVS.