On 6/12/06, Paul Marquess via RT <bug-BerkeleyDB@rt.cpan.org> wrote:
Show quoted text>
>
> <URL:
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=19821 >
>
> On Sat Jun 10 23:42:18 2006, DONGXU wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found that db_put with DB_APPEND will return the recno 0 by inserting
> > k/v into the newly created Recno database.
> > This bug is assumed to be fixed in Berkeley ver 4.0.14
> > My version is 4.2
> >
> > I created a primary Recno database with secondary Hash index, a db_pget
> > or c_pget against the secondary Hash database will always returns a
> > primary key which is the actual record number plus 1.
>
> I'm not clear if this is the same problem as your #19820 problem report.
> If it is still an issue with the new version (0.28) that is now on CPAN,
> can you provide me with more information about the error - some code to
> allow me to reproduce what you are seeing would be best.
confused by BerkeleyDB Docus on sleepycat. It is said that recno should
start
with 1 while I dumped the real db, at least it starts from 0 on my
machine; P
This should _NOT_ be a bug of the binding. Sorry, please close __TICKET__.
cheers
Show quoted text> Paul
>
>
>
--
Cheers, Dongxu
__END__
dongxu.wordpress.com
search.cpan.org/~dongxu