Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Brackup CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 18310
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: Brackup

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: adamk [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Consider Config::Tiny for your .ini file reader?
Config::Tiny provides pretty much exactly what you implemented inline, except perhaps it's a bit more flexible about a few things. Not critical, but worth considering using.
Not worth it. Code's already written, it's not much code, I'm able to evolve it quickly, not an extra dependency, ..... Lot of reasons. Just doesn't pay off switching at this point.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #18310] Consider Config::Tiny for your .ini file reader?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:41:08 +1000
To: bug-Brackup [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Adam Kennedy <adam [...] phase-n.com>
via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18310 > > > Not worth it. > > Code's already written, > it's not much code, > I'm able to evolve it quickly, > not an extra dependency, > ..... > > Lot of reasons. Just doesn't pay off switching at this point.
I was thinking mainly from the POV that almost inevitably people are going to start wanting to provide the configuration NOT as a config file. And one of the nice Config::Tiny things is that you can pass it around as an object. Also, it's a PBP-listed module. But then I like it mostly cause I wrote it :) Hence "consider"... Adam K
WONTFIX