Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Fuse CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 17735
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Fuse

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: scop [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: 0.07_3
Fixed in: 0.07_4



Subject: Fix build with fuse 2.4.2
Build of 0.07_3 with fuse 2.4.2 on Fedora Core 4 fails, fix attached. This change doesn't seem necessary with fuse 2.5.2, but doesn't appear to hurt with it either. Fuse.xs:550: warning: 'struct statvfs' declared inside parameter list Fuse.xs:550: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
Subject: perl-Fuse-0.07_3-statvfs.patch
--- Fuse.xs~ 2006-01-03 18:45:16.000000000 +0200 +++ Fuse.xs 2006-02-11 21:47:28.000000000 +0200 @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ #define _fuse_statvfs statfs #else #define _fuse_statvfs statvfs + #include <sys/statvfs.h> #endif int _PLfuse_statfs (const char *file, struct _fuse_statvfs *st) {
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #17735] Fix build with fuse 2.4.2
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:24:04 +0100
To: via RT <bug-Fuse [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Dobrica Pavlinusic <dpavlin [...] rot13.org>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:33:18PM -0500, via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> Build of 0.07_3 with fuse 2.4.2 on Fedora Core 4 fails, fix attached. > This change doesn't seem necessary with fuse 2.5.2, but doesn't appear > to hurt with it either.
Thanks for the patch, however final version of Fuse 0.07 will requiere fuse 2.5 (for FreeBSD compatibility). Would that be problem for Fedora users? -- Dobrica Pavlinusic 2share!2flame dpavlin@rot13.org Unix addict. Internet consultant. http://www.rot13.org/~dpavlin
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #17735] Fix build with fuse 2.4.2
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:33:41 +0200
To: bug-Fuse [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta [...] iki.fi>
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 13:25 -0500, dpavlin@rot13.org via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:33:18PM -0500, via RT wrote:
> > Build of 0.07_3 with fuse 2.4.2 on Fedora Core 4 fails, fix attached. > > This change doesn't seem necessary with fuse 2.5.2, but doesn't appear > > to hurt with it either.
> > Thanks for the patch, however final version of Fuse 0.07 will requiere > fuse 2.5 (for FreeBSD compatibility). Would that be problem for Fedora > users?
I don't think so. Fedora Extras for FC5 already has 2.5.2, FE4 still has 2.4.2. I would assume that FE4 would receive an update too sometime. By the way, I probably intend to submit the perl-Fuse package for review for inclusion in Fedora Extras sometime once 0.07 final is out.