Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the Log-Dispatch CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 14880
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Log-Dispatch

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: hkilmer [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: needs to be whacked to handle the new mod_perl2
mod_perl2 has re-arranged things. A better arrangement but it means that many packages need to be whacked - which is unfriendly.
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 11:45:56 -0500 (CDT)
From: Dave Rolsky <autarch [...] urth.org>
To: Guest via RT <bug-Log-Dispatch [...] rt.cpan.org>
Subject: Re: [cpan #14880] needs to be whacked to handle the new mod_perl2
RT-Send-Cc:
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Guest via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> > This message about Log-Dispatch was sent to you by guest <> via rt.cpan.org > > Full context and any attached attachments can be found at: > <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=14880 > > > mod_perl2 has re-arranged things. A better arrangement but it means > that many packages need to be whacked - which is unfriendly.
I have no idea what you're talking about. What needs to be "whacked"? What does "whacked" mean? -dave /*=================================================== VegGuide.Org www.BookIRead.com Your guide to all that's veg. My book blog ===================================================*/
mod_perl2's API changed and Log-Dispatch no longer conforms. So either it needs to be patched to support the new API or move away from using mod_perl2. [autarch@urth.org - Sun Oct 2 12:46:18 2005]: Show quoted text
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Guest via RT wrote: >
> > > > This message about Log-Dispatch was sent to you by guest <> via
> rt.cpan.org
> > > > Full context and any attached attachments can be found at: > > <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=14880 > > > > > mod_perl2 has re-arranged things. A better arrangement but it means > > that many packages need to be whacked - which is unfriendly.
> > I have no idea what you're talking about. What needs to be "whacked"? > What does "whacked" mean? > > > -dave > > /*=================================================== > VegGuide.Org www.BookIRead.com > Your guide to all that's veg. My book blog > ===================================================*/