At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 14:13:05 -0400 (EDT), Guest via RT wrote:
Show quoted text> In file included from TDB_File.xs:8:
> const-c.inc: In function `constant':
> const-c.inc:278: error: `TDB_ERR_LOCK_TIMEOUT' undeclared (first use in this function)
> const-c.inc:278: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> I've gotten the same results on SuSE Linux and Mac OS X, so I don't believe this is a platform problem
Hrm, ok. Just remove TDB_ERR_LOCK_TIMEOUT from the list in
Makefile.PL and ensure ExtUtils::Constant is available - unfortunately
there isn't an easy way I can test for this case, without doing a
compile attempt or something..
Show quoted text> I get the following errors:
>
> const-c.inc:278: error: for each function it appears in.)
> TDB_File.xs:14:18: '#' is not followed by a macro parameter
> TDB_File.xs: In function `XS_TDB_File_open':
> TDB_File.xs:280: error: `tdb_hash_func' undeclared (first use in this function)
> TDB_File.xs:280: error: parse error before "hash_func"
> TDB_File.xs:287: error: `hash_func' undeclared (first use in this function)
> TDB_File.xs:304: error: too many arguments to function `tdb_open_ex'
I'm a bit confused by tdb_hash_func being undeclared, since the
typedef at line ~18 should have declared it for you. You didn't pass
"has_hash_func" to Makefile.PL by any chance did you?
Show quoted text> TDB_File.c: In function `XS_TDB_File_printfreelist':
> TDB_File.c:852: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
This one is easy to fix too - just change the "int" before
tdb_printfreelist in TDB_File.xs to "void" (line 333).
Show quoted text> Looking through tdb-1.06 (the release version) these are indeed
> undefined. I'm wondering what this was compiled against.
I've developed it against the Debian libtdb package, which also claims
to be version 1.0.6. The problem is that (at least this package) has
changed the arguments to tdb_open_ex without changing the declared
version, so I added a "has_hash_func" argument to Makefile.PL (as
mentioned in README) to switch between the two versions of (Debian)
tdb that I have had exposure to.
Sorry for the inconvenience. I'll make sure I grab a pristine tdb
version directly from the primary site and test against that as well
as the Debian version in future.
I can see I'll have to have words with both the upstream tdb
maintainer and the Debian packager and come up with some better
solution to these compatibility issues :(
(It's complicated by the fact that the tdb in samba has changed
slightly too)
--
- Gus
