Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the CGI-SSI CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 13351
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: CGI-SSI

People
Owner: james [...] bitperfect.com
Requestors: sds [...] iastate.edu
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Passthrough of parent request parameters
While developing for a local site it became neccessary to pass along cookies , get inputs, and sometimes post inputs, the user_agent, and the orginal referer to an SSI included script from the calling 'parent' script. To complicate matters the SSI included script was hosted on a different server and the cookie contents are variable for each client. I altered the standard SSI.pm to solve this (see attached patch file). There weren't too many changes. Are you interested in rolling these changes into the stock SSI.pm? Thanks
Download ssi_patch
application/octet-stream 4.6k

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.

[guest - Tue Jun 21 12:24:57 2005]: Show quoted text
> I altered the standard SSI.pm to solve this (see attached patch file). > There weren't too many changes. Are you interested in rolling these > changes into the stock SSI.pm?
This sounds great. Would you be willing to also write some doc and tests? If so, I'll apply them. If not, let me know and I'll do it myself, but I don't know when. You can see that I use a host (www.bitperfect.com) for testing. Feel free to use that script as well. Thanks! James
Sure I'd be willing. I've not written any tests before, but I'll look through yours and see what I can come up with. As for the documentation, should I include it in the existing pod and send along another patch file?? -- [JAMES - Mon Jun 27 08:43:17 2005]: Show quoted text
> This sounds great. Would you be willing to also write some doc and > tests? If so, I'll apply them. If not, let me know and I'll do it > myself, but I don't know when. > > You can see that I use a host (www.bitperfect.com) for testing. Feel > free to use that script as well. > > Thanks! > > James
[guest - Wed Jul 6 16:30:42 2005]: Show quoted text
> Sure I'd be willing. I've not written any tests before, but I'll look > through yours and see what I can come up with. As for the > documentation, should I include it in the existing pod and send along > another patch file??
Sounds good.
Whatever demand there may once have been for this feature is now seemingly no more. So I'm closing this ticket. James