Subject: | Very minor ambiguity in licensing |
Multiple files say:
./lib/Date/Pcalc/Object.pod-1323-This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
./lib/Date/Pcalc/Object.pod:1324:modify it under the same terms as Perl itself, i.e., under the
./lib/Date/Pcalc/Object.pod:1325:terms of the "Artistic License" or the "GNU General Public License".
And this adds some confusion, as it suggests "Artistic-1 OR GPL-1", while the perl license stipulates that GPL-1, or any newer version is acceptable.
More over, some parts of this dist are LGPL licensed, and this is not made very clear at the top level, other than the hint from the included copy of GNU_LGPL.txt
--
- CPAN kentnl@cpan.org
- Gentoo Perl Maintainer kentnl@gentoo.org ( perl@gentoo.org )
./lib/Date/Pcalc/Object.pod-1323-This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
./lib/Date/Pcalc/Object.pod:1324:modify it under the same terms as Perl itself, i.e., under the
./lib/Date/Pcalc/Object.pod:1325:terms of the "Artistic License" or the "GNU General Public License".
And this adds some confusion, as it suggests "Artistic-1 OR GPL-1", while the perl license stipulates that GPL-1, or any newer version is acceptable.
More over, some parts of this dist are LGPL licensed, and this is not made very clear at the top level, other than the hint from the included copy of GNU_LGPL.txt
--
- CPAN kentnl@cpan.org
- Gentoo Perl Maintainer kentnl@gentoo.org ( perl@gentoo.org )