Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Net-SSLeay CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 126986
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Net-SSLeay

People
Owner: RADIATOR [...] cpan.org
Requestors: dam [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 1.86_06



From: dam [...] cpan.org
Subject: [PATCH] add get/set_security_level() routines
In Debian we are currently applying the following patch to Net-SSLeay. We thought you might be interested in it too. Description: add set_security_level() routines This patch adds SSL_[CTX_](set|get)_security_level() routines . They are needed at least by the tests that use certificates with 1024-bit keys in environments with openssl with default security level of 2, which requires at least 2048-bit keys Author: Damyan Ivanov <dmn@debian.org> The patch is tracked in our Git repository at https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libnet-ssleay-perl/raw/master/debian/patches/add-security-level-routines.patch Thanks for considering, Damyan Ivanov, Debian Perl Group
Here's the patch.

Message body is not shown because sender requested not to inline it.

On Wed Aug 29 21:05:06 2018, DAM wrote: Show quoted text
> In Debian we are currently applying the following patch to > Net-SSLeay. > We thought you might be interested in it too. > > Description: add set_security_level() routines > This patch adds SSL_[CTX_](set|get)_security_level() routines > . > They are needed at least by the tests that use certificates with > 1024-bit keys > in environments with openssl with default security level of 2, which > requires > at least 2048-bit keys
Thanks, Damyan --- I think this patch implements what we were looking for in https://github.com/radiator-software/p5-net-ssleay/issues/37. I'll check with Heikki, and if so, we'll apply it.
On Wed 29.elokuu 2018 16:33:09, CHRISN wrote: Show quoted text
> Thanks, Damyan --- I think this patch implements what we were looking > for in https://github.com/radiator-software/p5-net-ssleay/issues/37. > I'll check with Heikki, and if so, we'll apply it.
Looks good to me too. There's a branch in github that has the patch applied. The only functional change I did was to add check for LibreSSL since it does not implement these functions. I also updated the pod changes a little and fixed some wordings (context -> level) in the new test file. I'll merge it to github master soon.
On pe 31.elokuu 2018 08:41:36, RADIATOR wrote: Show quoted text
> Looks good to me too. There's a branch in github that has the patch > applied. The only functional change I did was to add check for > LibreSSL since it does not implement these functions. I also updated > the pod changes a little and fixed some wordings (context -> level) in > the new test file. I'll merge it to github master soon.
Now merged to master in github.