Bug #125832 for DateTime-Format-Builder: Bad license declaration

Thu Jul 12 08:04:05 2018 ppisar [...] redhat.com - Ticket created

Subject:

Bad license declaration

examples/W3CDTF.pm, examples/MySQL.pm, lib/DateTime/Format/Builder/Tutorial.pod files have a license declaration: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. The full text of the license can be found in the LICENSE file included with this module. That means "GPL+ or Artistic" <,https://dev.perl.org/licenses/>, but LICENSE file lists "Artistic 2.0" license. These two do not match. Could you please clarify what license terms apply to the three files and adjust them or the the LICENSE file in accordance?

Fri May 03 06:59:48 2019 ppisar [...] redhat.com - Correspondence added

Dne Čt 12.čec.2018 08:04:05, ppisar napsal(a): Show quoted text

> examples/W3CDTF.pm, examples/MySQL.pm, > lib/DateTime/Format/Builder/Tutorial.pod files have a license > declaration: > > This program > is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the > same terms as Perl itself. > > The full text of the license can be found in the LICENSE file included > with this module. > > That means "GPL+ or Artistic" <,https://dev.perl.org/licenses/>, but > LICENSE file lists "Artistic 2.0" license. These two do not match. > > Could you please clarify what license terms apply to the three files > and adjust them or the the LICENSE file in accordance?

I can see lib/DateTime/Format/Builder/Tutorial.pod was changed to Artistic 2.0. But examples/W3CDTF.pm and examples/MySQL.pm are still "under the same terms as Perl itself".

Sun Aug 09 13:56:04 2020 DROLSKY [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Ticket migrated to GitHub as https://github.com/houseabsolute/DateTime-Format-Builder/issues/5

Sun Aug 09 13:56:04 2020 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Sun Aug 09 13:56:04 2020 DROLSKY [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'