Bug #120060 for Net-Ping: Issue Net-Ping Module

Wed Feb 01 06:43:08 2017 latency.jammer [...] gmail.com - Ticket created

Subject:	Issue Net-Ping Module
Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:42:42 +0100
To:	bug-Net-Ping [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Mattia Fecit <latency.jammer [...] gmail.com>

Hi there, I've a problem with upgrading this module [by cpan]. [cpan output] Show quoted text

>> WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! >> Primary key fingerprint: 2E66 557A B97C 19C7 91AF 8E20 328D

A867 450F 89EC ... trimmed (verbose) output ... Show quoted text

>> Signature invalid for distribution file. Please investigate.

Show quoted text

>> Some error occurred while checking its signature, so it

could be invalid. Show quoted text

>> Failed during this command:

RURBAN/Net-Ping-2.56.tar.gz : signature_verify NO Verification is made by Module::Signature. Deleting and re-downloading the module does not lead to solution for this issue. Thanks for your attention.

Wed Feb 01 13:33:11 2017 RURBAN [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #120060] Issue Net-Ping Module
Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:32:56 +0100
To:	bug-Net-Ping [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Reini Urban <rurban [...] cpan.org>

I think I recently extended my gpg key. Will re-upload it, resigned. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Mattia Fecit via RT < bug-Net-Ping@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text

> Wed Feb 01 06:43:08 2017: Request 120060 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by latency.jammer@gmail.com > Queue: Net-Ping > Subject: Issue Net-Ping Module > Broken in: (no value) > Severity: (no value) > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: latency.jammer@gmail.com > Status: new > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=120060 > > > > Hi there, > > I've a problem with upgrading this module [by cpan]. > > [cpan output]

> >> WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > >> Primary key fingerprint: 2E66 557A B97C 19C7 91AF 8E20 328D

> A867 450F 89EC > > ... trimmed (verbose) output ... >

> >> Signature invalid for distribution file. Please investigate.

>

> >> Some error occurred while checking its signature, so it

> could be invalid. >

> >> Failed during this command:

> RURBAN/Net-Ping-2.56.tar.gz : signature_verify NO > > Verification is made by Module::Signature. > Deleting and re-downloading the module does not lead to solution for > this issue. > > Thanks for your attention. >

-- -- Reini

Wed Feb 01 13:33:12 2017 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Wed Feb 01 13:40:39 2017 RURBAN [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

Please gpg --recv-keys 591E185470BE7C57CCF4516D9A6D92628FFDC942 and retry with the new 2.57 -- Reini Urban

Wed Feb 01 13:40:40 2017 RURBAN [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Wed Feb 08 16:21:00 2017 latency.jammer [...] gmail.com - Correspondence added

Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #120060] Resolved: Issue Net-Ping Module
Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:20:24 +0100
To:	bug-Net-Ping [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Mattia Fecit <latency.jammer [...] gmail.com>

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:40:40 -0500 "Reini Urban via RT" <bug-Net-Ping@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text

> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=120060 > > > According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have > any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.

I've in gpg "keyring" your key [output from gpg --list-keys] ... pub dsa1024 2008-03-22 [SC] [expires: 2017-12-15] 591E185470BE7C57CCF4516D9A6D92628FFDC942 uid [ unknown] Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at> uid [ unknown] Reini Urban <rurban@cpan.org> uid [ unknown] Reini Urban <reini@cpanel.net> uid [ unknown] Reini Urban <rurban@cpanel.net> uid [ unknown] Reini Urban <reini.urban@gmail.com> uid [ unknown] [jpeg image of size 32905] ... When I try to upgrade all back left packages, I get [output from upgrade command, into cpan] gpg: Signature made Wed 01 Feb 2017 07:38:29 PM CET gpg: using DSA key 591E185470BE7C57CCF4516D9A6D92628FFDC942 gpg: BAD signature from "Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at>" [unknown] ==> BAD/TAMPERED signature detected! <== Where, by gpg keys receiver, I get [output of gpg --recv-keys 591E185470BE7C57CCF4516D9A6D92628FFDC942] gpg: key 9A6D92628FFDC942: "Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at>" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 I cannot spot the error...