Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Module-Build-Tiny CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 119913
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: Module-Build-Tiny

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: skaji [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Request: support --pureperl-only
Currently, Module::Build::Tiny accepts --pureperl-only option, but actually it always dies. ``` $ perl Build.PL --pureperl-only Creating new 'Build' script for 'Foo' version '0.001' $ ./Build cp lib/Foo.pm blib/lib/Foo.pm Can't build xs files under --pureperl-only Show quoted text
> echo $?
2 ``` Does Module::Build::Tiny support --pureperl-only in the feature?
On Thu Jan 19 10:00:46 2017, SKAJI wrote: Show quoted text
> Currently, Module::Build::Tiny accepts --pureperl-only option, but > actually it always dies. > ``` > $ perl Build.PL --pureperl-only > Creating new 'Build' script for 'Foo' version '0.001' > > $ ./Build > cp lib/Foo.pm blib/lib/Foo.pm > Can't build xs files under --pureperl-only >
> > echo $?
> 2 > ``` > > Does Module::Build::Tiny support --pureperl-only in the feature?
I think what you mean is an 'allow_pureperl' option. As Module::Build::Tiny is lacking configuration, that's currently not possible, and as such I have to reject the feature request. Leon
Fair enough. Thanks for the reply! On 2017-10-29T05:11:01-04:00, LEONT wrote: Show quoted text
> On Thu Jan 19 10:00:46 2017, SKAJI wrote:
> > Currently, Module::Build::Tiny accepts --pureperl-only option, but > > actually it always dies. > > ``` > > $ perl Build.PL --pureperl-only > > Creating new 'Build' script for 'Foo' version '0.001' > > > > $ ./Build > > cp lib/Foo.pm blib/lib/Foo.pm > > Can't build xs files under --pureperl-only > >
> > > echo $?
> > 2 > > ``` > > > > Does Module::Build::Tiny support --pureperl-only in the feature?
> > I think what you mean is an 'allow_pureperl' option. As > Module::Build::Tiny is lacking configuration, that's currently not > possible, and as such I have to reject the feature request. > > Leon