Bug #115865 for IPTables-Rule: Undefined subroutine &IPTables::Rule::is_valid_inet_cidr called at IPTables/Rule.pm line 479/487

Mon Jul 04 15:16:28 2016 rest [...] xicon.de - Ticket created

Subject:	Undefined subroutine &IPTables::Rule::is_valid_inet_cidr called at IPTables/Rule.pm line 479/487
Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:16:15 +0200
To:	bug-IPTables-Rule [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	XiconRest <rest [...] xicon.de>

Dear IPTables::Rule maintainer, it looks like there is function name miss-used: is_valid_inet_cidr should be __is_valid_inet_cidr. Patch is attached. Best regards xiconfjs

Message body is not shown because sender requested not to inline it.

Mon Jul 04 18:17:01 2016 rest [...] xicon.de - Correspondence added

Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #115865] Undefined subroutine &IPTables::Rule::is_valid_inet_cidr called at IPTables/Rule.pm line 479/487
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2016 00:16:44 +0200
To:	bug-IPTables-Rule [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	XiconRest <rest [...] xicon.de>

Am 04.07.16 um 21:16 schrieb Bugs in IPTables-Rule via RT: Show quoted text

> it looks like there is function name miss-used: is_valid_inet_cidr > should be __is_valid_inet_cidr. > > Patch is attached.

I'm sorry, the first created and attached patch file is generated the wrong way. Here is the corrected one attached. Thanks and best regards xiconfjs

Message body is not shown because sender requested not to inline it.

Wed Jul 06 00:26:48 2016 fukawi2 [...] gmail.com - Correspondence added

Fixed in this commit: https://github.com/fukawi2/IPTables-Rule/commit/0c62e2d19d26cececde472fda0144b69e3c89f53 Released in v0.02

Wed Jul 06 00:26:49 2016 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Wed Jul 06 00:26:49 2016 fukawi2 [...] gmail.com - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Wed Jul 06 00:26:54 2016 fukawi2 [...] gmail.com - Taken