Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the File-Copy-Undoable CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 115210
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: File-Copy-Undoable
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Thu Jun 09 13:01:18 2016 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: "BUG: Wrapper code can't be compiled" (0.10)
On some smoker systems I see the following test failure: ... # Looks like you planned 0 tests but ran 1. # Looks like you planned 0 tests but ran 1. BUG: Wrapper code can't be compiled: syntax error at (eval 109) line 5, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 6, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 7, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 8, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 9, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 10, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 11, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 12, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 13, near "require HASH(" syntax error at (eval 109) line 14, near "require HASH(" (eval 109) has too many errors. # Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen. # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 1. t/cp.t ................... Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) All 1 subtests passed ...
  Thu Jun 09 13:03:05 2016 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On 2016-06-09 13:01:18, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> On some smoker systems I see the following test failure: > > ... > # Looks like you planned 0 tests but ran 1. > # Looks like you planned 0 tests but ran 1. > BUG: Wrapper code can't be compiled: syntax error at (eval 109) line > 5, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 6, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 7, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 8, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 9, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 10, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 11, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 12, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 13, near "require HASH(" > syntax error at (eval 109) line 14, near "require HASH(" > (eval 109) has too many errors. > # Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not > seen. > # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 1. > t/cp.t ................... > Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > All 1 subtests passed > ...
Similar/same problems also in File-Move-Undoable and File-Patch-Undoable.
  Thu Jun 09 23:16:52 2016 PERLANCAR [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Yup, this is yet another one of those "needs to bump minimum version of various prereqs" thing: there's a backward-incompatible change introduced in Data::Sah 0.79. So we need to upgrade to Perinci::Sub::Wrapper 0.83. Which means we need to release a new version of Perinci::Access::Schemeless. Which means need to release new Test::Perinci::Tx::Manager. Done.
  Thu Jun 09 23:16:52 2016 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Thu Jun 09 23:16:53 2016 PERLANCAR [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'