Bug #113809 for Tree: Which license?

Fri Apr 15 04:40:51 2016 ppisar [...] redhat.com - Ticket created

Subject:

Which license?

The Perl module files like lib/Tree.pm state: This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. <http://dev.perl.org/licenses/> defines Perl license as GPL 1 or newer or Artistic 1. But the LICENSE file quotes Artistic 2.0 license. May I ask which of the two statements follow your intention? The current situation makes the three module files (GPL+ or Artistic) and all the other files (Makefile.PL, tests etc.) Artistic 2.0. I think it's not what you want. Could you please provide a clarification?

Fri Apr 15 07:35:21 2016 ron [...] savage.net.au - Correspondence added

Subject:	Re: [rt.cpan.org #113809] Which license?
Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:35:03 +1000
To:	bug-Tree [...] rt.cpan.org
From:	Ron Savage <ron [...] savage.net.au>

Hi Petr I suspect that's my mistake. I'll release a fix over the weekend, going with the Perl licence (as we spell it in Australia). On 15/04/16 18:40, Petr Pisar via RT wrote: Show quoted text

> Fri Apr 15 04:40:51 2016: Request 113809 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by ppisar > Queue: Tree > Subject: Which license? > Broken in: 1.07 > Severity: (no value) > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: ppisar@redhat.com > Status: new > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=113809 > > > > The Perl module files like lib/Tree.pm state: > > This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under > the same terms as Perl itself. > > <http://dev.perl.org/licenses/> defines Perl license as GPL 1 or newer or Artistic 1. > > But the LICENSE file quotes Artistic 2.0 license. > > May I ask which of the two statements follow your intention? The current situation makes the three module files (GPL+ or Artistic) and all the other files (Makefile.PL, tests etc.) Artistic 2.0. I think it's not what you want. > > Could you please provide a clarification? >

-- Ron Savage - savage.net.au

Fri Apr 15 07:35:21 2016 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Wed Apr 20 21:20:47 2016 RSAVAGE [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added 15 min

I've released V 1.08 and it's now on CPAN. There are no code changes but there are various cleanups of the distro itself. See the Changes file for details.

Wed Apr 20 21:20:53 2016 RSAVAGE [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Thu May 05 08:28:06 2016 ppisar [...] redhat.com - Status changed from 'resolved' to 'open'

Thu May 05 08:29:46 2016 ppisar [...] redhat.com - Correspondence added

From:

ppisar [...] redhat.com

Dne St 20.dub.2016 21:20:47, RSAVAGE napsal(a): Show quoted text

> I've released V 1.08 and it's now on CPAN.

Thanks. But the META files still declare Artistic 2.0 because the Makefile.PL and Build.pl do so. I think they should be fixed too.

Wed Sep 14 04:21:25 2016 RSAVAGE [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added 10 min

Fixed in V 1.09, which is now on CPAN. Thanx!

Wed Sep 14 04:21:26 2016 RSAVAGE [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'

Wed Sep 14 04:21:31 2016 RSAVAGE [...] cpan.org - Taken