Bug #113688 for Perinci-Sub-Normalize: Fails if Perinci::Sub::Property::retry is installed and Perinci::Sub::Property::result::table is not installed

Mon Apr 11 15:15:04 2016 ANDK [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

Fails if Perinci::Sub::Property::retry is installed and Perinci::Sub::Property::result::table is not installed

This is a border case that probably does not deserve a ticket, but then, it may help to tighten the rules of what to test and what to skip. As per subject. I took a fresh perl and installed Perinci::Sub::Property::retry. It took me a while to guess the dependency on Cpanel::JSON::XS right, but this is a separate matter. The point is that after that I had Perinci::Sub::Property::retry installed but not Perinci::Sub::Property::result::table. By coincidence I had also Perinci::Sub::Normalize installed. But then I tried to *test* Perinci::Sub::Normalize just to make the point. Because apparently 5 others had already managed to reach this point. This test failed. My report has not yet arrived at cpantesters but here is a link to a similar test report: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/64089728 HTH&&Thanks,

Tue Apr 12 04:24:14 2016 PERLANCAR [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:15:04 GMT, ANDK wrote: Show quoted text

> This is a border case that probably does not deserve a ticket, but > then, it may help to tighten the rules of what to test and what to > skip. > > As per subject. I took a fresh perl and installed > Perinci::Sub::Property::retry. It took me a while to guess the > dependency on Cpanel::JSON::XS right, but this is a separate matter. > The point is that after that I had Perinci::Sub::Property::retry > installed but not Perinci::Sub::Property::result::table. > > By coincidence I had also Perinci::Sub::Normalize installed. But then > I tried to *test* Perinci::Sub::Normalize just to make the point. > Because apparently 5 others had already managed to reach this point. > This test failed. My report has not yet arrived at cpantesters but > here is a link to a similar test report: > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/64089728 > > HTH&&Thanks,

Thanks, fixed. The test should've also checked for the availability of Perinci::Sub::Property::result::table in the optional tests section.

Tue Apr 12 04:24:14 2016 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Tue Apr 12 04:24:16 2016 PERLANCAR [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'