On 2016-01-20 12:40:43, DROLSKY wrote:
Show quoted text> On Tue Jan 19 17:59:27 2016, ETHER wrote:
>
>
> I took a look at the test in question. It's testing the object
> internals rather than testing the effects of a the close_after_write
> option. The internals in questions are entirely in the parent class,
> so this doesn't really seem justified. I think this should be fixed in
> LD::File::Stamped's test code.
Ok. I'll look for a way of verifying that the handle changes when close_after_write is set.
Since undef == undef, I should be able to just pass the test if the fh comes back as undefined (since it must be recreated in that case).