Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 111130
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: GHENRY [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Critical
Broken in: 0.04
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: $ENV{REMOTE_ADDR}
Why would you set remote_address like this? https://metacpan.org/source/JJNAPIORK/HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA-0.04/lib/HTML/FormHandlerX/Field/reCAPTCHA.pm#L53 So you can switch between domains you've registered with Google for reCAPTCHA? i.e. dev/testing etc.? I've set it but a valid form submission dies with below: Attribute (remote_address) does not pass the type constraint because: Validation failed for 'Str' with value undef at accessor HTML::FormHandlerX::Field::reCAPTCHA::remote_address (defined at /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2/HTML/FormHandlerX/Field/reCAPTCHA.pm line 18) line 18 Let me know if I'm being thick. Thanks.
This was addressed in the git repo (https://github.com/jjn1056/HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA/pull/1), but it has not been released to CPAN. I think John is looking for a new maintainer. I submitted the original PR, but I no longer use reCAPTCHA. Also, I think this version of reCAPTCHA might have been obsoleted by Google. On Tue Jan 12 12:05:49 2016, GHENRY wrote: Show quoted text
> Why would you set remote_address like this? > > https://metacpan.org/source/JJNAPIORK/HTML-FormHandlerX-Field- > reCAPTCHA-0.04/lib/HTML/FormHandlerX/Field/reCAPTCHA.pm#L53 > > So you can switch between domains you've registered with Google for > reCAPTCHA? i.e. dev/testing etc.? > > I've set it but a valid form submission dies with below: > > Attribute (remote_address) does not pass the type constraint because: > Validation failed for 'Str' with value undef at accessor > HTML::FormHandlerX::Field::reCAPTCHA::remote_address (defined at > /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2/HTML/FormHandlerX/Field/reCAPTCHA.pm line > 18) line 18 > > Let me know if I'm being thick. > > Thanks.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #111130] $ENV{REMOTE_ADDR}
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:10:42 +0000
To: bug-HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Gavin Henry <ghenry [...] suretec.co.uk>
Hi Mark, OK, thanks. I could look after it and upgrade it. Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Do you know we have our own VoIP provider called SureVoIP®? See http://www.surevoip.co.uk OpenPGP (GPG/PGP) Public Key: 0x8CFBA8E6 - Import from hkp://subkeys.pgp.net or http://www.suretecgroup.com/0x8CFBA8E6.gpg On 12 Jan 2016 18:15, "Mark Grimes via RT" < bug-HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=111130 > > > This was addressed in the git repo ( > https://github.com/jjn1056/HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA/pull/1), but > it has not been released to CPAN. > > I think John is looking for a new maintainer. I submitted the original PR, > but I no longer use reCAPTCHA. Also, I think this version of reCAPTCHA > might have been obsoleted by Google. > > On Tue Jan 12 12:05:49 2016, GHENRY wrote:
> > Why would you set remote_address like this? > > > > https://metacpan.org/source/JJNAPIORK/HTML-FormHandlerX-Field- > > reCAPTCHA-0.04/lib/HTML/FormHandlerX/Field/reCAPTCHA.pm#L53 > > > > So you can switch between domains you've registered with Google for > > reCAPTCHA? i.e. dev/testing etc.? > > > > I've set it but a valid form submission dies with below: > > > > Attribute (remote_address) does not pass the type constraint because: > > Validation failed for 'Str' with value undef at accessor > > HTML::FormHandlerX::Field::reCAPTCHA::remote_address (defined at > > /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2/HTML/FormHandlerX/Field/reCAPTCHA.pm line > > 18) line 18 > > > > Let me know if I'm being thick. > > > > Thanks.
> > > >
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #111130] $ENV{REMOTE_ADDR}
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:11:06 +0000
To: bug-HTML-FormHandlerX-Field-reCAPTCHA [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Gavin Henry <ghenry [...] suretec.co.uk>
What do use instead?