Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the HTML-TagUtil CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 110835
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: HTML-TagUtil

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: bkb [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: It seems to be broken
The module seems to be broken, I cannot view the documentation on metacpan.org: https://metacpan.org/pod/HTML::TagUtil There is pod inside the module: https://api.metacpan.org/source/LINC/HTML-TagUtil-1.45/TagUtil.pm but it doesn't display. Also the home page for the module doesn't show correctly but leads to an error page on Google Plus.
On 2016-01-01 18:43:20, BKB wrote: Show quoted text
> The module seems to be broken, I cannot view the documentation on > metacpan.org: > > https://metacpan.org/pod/HTML::TagUtil > > There is pod inside the module: > > https://api.metacpan.org/source/LINC/HTML-TagUtil-1.45/TagUtil.pm > > but it doesn't display. > > Also the home page for the module doesn't show correctly but leads to > an error page on Google Plus.
The latest indexed version os 1.43. 1.45 did not reindex for some reason.
CC: BKB <bkb [...] cpan.org>
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #110835] It seems to be broken
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:02:31 +0900
To: bug-HTML-TagUtil [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Ben Bullock <benkasminbullock [...] gmail.com>
On 2 January 2016 at 14:34, Karen Etheridge via RT <bug-HTML-TagUtil@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> The latest indexed version os 1.43. 1.45 did not reindex for some reason.
The documentation is changed from 1.43 to 1.45: ---- https://api.metacpan.org/source/LINC/HTML-TagUtil-1.45/TagUtil.pm =head1 DESCRIPTION HTML::TagUtil is a perl module providing a Object-Oriented interface to getting information about HTML/SGML/XML tags and their attributes and content. ----- https://api.metacpan.org/source/LINC/HTML-TagUtil-1.43/lib/HTML/TagUtil.pm =head1 DESCRIPTION Stub documentation for HTML::TagUtil-1.43, created by h2xs. It looks like the author of the extension was negligent enough to leave the stub unedited. Blah blah blah. -----