Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Geo-OGC-Service-WFS CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 108518
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Geo-OGC-Service-WFS
People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in:
  • 0.04
  • 0.05
Fixed in: (no value)

History Show all quoted text
  Fri Nov 06 13:38:45 2015 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: No success test reports
It seems that the distribution had never pass reports: http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Geo-OGC-Service-WFS;maxver=1 Either the t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t test fails: # Failed test at t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t line 116. # got: 'Empty String at t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t line 113. # ' # expected: '0' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 6. t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/6 subtests ... or it cannot be used at all because perl 5.22.0 is required at minimum (why? such a new perl is yet quite uncommon).
  Fri Nov 06 14:29:57 2015 ari.jolma [...] gmail.com - Correspondence added
On Fri Nov 06 13:38:45 2015, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> It seems that the distribution had never pass reports: > http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Geo-OGC-Service-WFS;maxver=1 > > Either the t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t test fails: > > # Failed test at t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t line 116. > # got: 'Empty String at t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t line 113. > # ' > # expected: '0' > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 6. > t/Geo-OGC-Service-WFS.t .. > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > Failed 1/6 subtests > > > ... or it cannot be used at all because perl 5.22.0 is required at > minimum (why? such a new perl is yet quite uncommon).
The failure is due to a bug in GDAL, which will be corrected in 2.0.2 and 2.1. However, the latest Geo::GDAL in CPAN downloads the latest GDAL 2.0 if not in the system and the test succeeds. The 5.22.0 requirement is just there because h2xs put it there, I could relax it but I don't yet know to what.
  Fri Nov 06 14:29:57 2015 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Fri Nov 06 16:52:23 2015 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On 2015-11-06 14:29:57, AJOLMA wrote: Show quoted text
> On Fri Nov 06 13:38:45 2015, SREZIC wrote:
[...] Show quoted text
> > > > ... or it cannot be used at all because perl 5.22.0 is required at > > minimum (why? such a new perl is yet quite uncommon).
> > The failure is due to a bug in GDAL, which will be corrected in 2.0.2 > and 2.1. However, the latest Geo::GDAL in CPAN downloads the latest > GDAL 2.0 if not in the system and the test succeeds. > > The 5.22.0 requirement is just there because h2xs put it there, I > could relax it but I don't yet know to what.
My recommendation is to not specify any minimum perl version, unless you know that you're using "modern" syntax constructs (e.g. defined-or, s///r, package block etc.). Check CPAN Testers results afterwards to see if there might be a reason for a minimum version.
  Sat Nov 07 02:14:52 2015 ari.jolma [...] gmail.com - Correspondence added
On Fri Nov 06 16:52:23 2015, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> On 2015-11-06 14:29:57, AJOLMA wrote:
> > On Fri Nov 06 13:38:45 2015, SREZIC wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > > ... or it cannot be used at all because perl 5.22.0 is required at > > > minimum (why? such a new perl is yet quite uncommon).
> > > > The failure is due to a bug in GDAL, which will be corrected in 2.0.2 > > and 2.1. However, the latest Geo::GDAL in CPAN downloads the latest > > GDAL 2.0 if not in the system and the test succeeds. > > > > The 5.22.0 requirement is just there because h2xs put it there, I > > could relax it but I don't yet know to what.
> > My recommendation is to not specify any minimum perl version, unless > you know that you're using "modern" syntax constructs (e.g. defined- > or, s///r, package block etc.). Check CPAN Testers results afterwards > to see if there might be a reason for a minimum version.
I put now 5.10 since I like // and //=. I also uploaded Geo::GDAL 2.00015, which should not have any more longdouble issues.
  Mon Mar 20 15:47:39 2017 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On 2015-11-07 02:14:52, AJOLMA wrote: Show quoted text
> On Fri Nov 06 16:52:23 2015, SREZIC wrote:
> > On 2015-11-06 14:29:57, AJOLMA wrote:
> > > On Fri Nov 06 13:38:45 2015, SREZIC wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > > > > ... or it cannot be used at all because perl 5.22.0 is required > > > > at > > > > minimum (why? such a new perl is yet quite uncommon).
> > > > > > The failure is due to a bug in GDAL, which will be corrected in > > > 2.0.2 > > > and 2.1. However, the latest Geo::GDAL in CPAN downloads the latest > > > GDAL 2.0 if not in the system and the test succeeds. > > > > > > The 5.22.0 requirement is just there because h2xs put it there, I > > > could relax it but I don't yet know to what.
> > > > My recommendation is to not specify any minimum perl version, unless > > you know that you're using "modern" syntax constructs (e.g. defined- > > or, s///r, package block etc.). Check CPAN Testers results afterwards > > to see if there might be a reason for a minimum version.
> > I put now 5.10 since I like // and //=. > > I also uploaded Geo::GDAL 2.00015, which should not have any more > longdouble issues.
I mark this ticket as resolved as the initial issue ("It seems that the distribution had never pass reports") is not true anymore.
  Mon Mar 20 15:47:45 2017 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'