Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the namespace-autoclean CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 107643
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: namespace-autoclean
People
Owner: ether [...] cpan.org
Requestors: CHORNY [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity: Normal
Broken in: 0.27
Fixed in: 0.28

History Show all quoted text
  Thu Oct 08 19:26:11 2015 CHORNY [...] cpan.org - Ticket created
Subject: tests fail with old Moo
moo.t fails with Moo <= 1.003001 (at least) http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0b4654fb-6bf4-1014-8741-a057e89c40f7 moo.t fails with Moo <= 2.000002 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/3291242c-6c07-11e5-a6c8-e149671af64e -- Alexandr Ciornii, http://chorny.net
  Fri Oct 09 12:42:22 2015 ether [...] cpan.org - Taken
  Fri Oct 09 13:10:33 2015 haarg [...] haarg.org - Correspondence added
On Thu Oct 08 19:26:11 2015, CHORNY wrote: Show quoted text
> moo.t fails with Moo <= 1.003001 (at least) > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0b4654fb-6bf4-1014-8741- > a057e89c40f7 > > moo.t fails with Moo <= 2.000002 > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/3291242c-6c07-11e5-a6c8- > e149671af64e
I tested with Moo 1.003001 and didn't get any failures, so there's something else going on here. The second report is a known bug in Moo 2.000000/2.000001 and specific combinations of List::Util and Sub::Util.
  Fri Oct 09 13:10:35 2015 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
  Fri Oct 09 13:17:58 2015 haarg [...] haarg.org - Correspondence added
On Fri Oct 09 13:10:33 2015, haarg wrote: Show quoted text
> On Thu Oct 08 19:26:11 2015, CHORNY wrote:
> > moo.t fails with Moo <= 1.003001 (at least) > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0b4654fb-6bf4-1014-8741- > > a057e89c40f7 > > > > moo.t fails with Moo <= 2.000002 > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/3291242c-6c07-11e5-a6c8- > > e149671af64e
> > I tested with Moo 1.003001 and didn't get any failures, so there's > something else going on here. > > The second report is a known bug in Moo 2.000000/2.000001 and specific > combinations of List::Util and Sub::Util.
Actually, I made a mistake when testing, and can reproduce the first issue. The moo-with-moose.t test probably should just be adjusted to only test with more up to date versions of Moo.
  Mon Oct 12 16:18:40 2015 ether [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On 2015-10-09 10:17:58, haarg wrote: Show quoted text
> On Fri Oct 09 13:10:33 2015, haarg wrote:
> > On Thu Oct 08 19:26:11 2015, CHORNY wrote:
> > > moo.t fails with Moo <= 1.003001 (at least) > > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0b4654fb-6bf4-1014-8741- > > > a057e89c40f7 > > > > > > moo.t fails with Moo <= 2.000002 > > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/3291242c-6c07-11e5-a6c8- > > > e149671af64e
> > > > I tested with Moo 1.003001 and didn't get any failures, so there's > > something else going on here. > > > > The second report is a known bug in Moo 2.000000/2.000001 and > > specific > > combinations of List::Util and Sub::Util.
> > Actually, I made a mistake when testing, and can reproduce the first > issue. The moo-with-moose.t test probably should just be adjusted to > only test with more up to date versions of Moo.
Confirmed (after fixing the use of 'do' in some tests to not use the local directory when running tests elsewhere). A bisect run revealed the tests start passing with Moo commit fb8177f7e3b ("exclude subs imported before Moo from being inflated as methods"), which was in Moo 1.004000.
  Mon Oct 12 21:27:17 2015 ether [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
Both these issues are resolved with version 0.28. thanks!
  Mon Oct 12 21:27:24 2015 ether [...] cpan.org - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'
  Tue Oct 13 13:43:50 2015 ether [...] cpan.org - Fixed in 0.28 added