Bug #107263 for Tie-Hash-Layered: Tests 16..19 fail

Wed Sep 23 08:53:53 2015 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Ticket created

Subject:

Tests 16..19 fail

See http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/91830c7a-2464-11e4-9114-fb9fc2c19918 for a sample fail report. Additionally, by using test.pl instead of t/*.t failures are not visible at cpantesters, so http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tie-Hash-Layered+0.9 looks quite green in spite of the existing test failures.

Wed Sep 23 08:56:20 2015 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On 2015-09-23 08:53:53, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text

> See http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/91830c7a-2464-11e4-9114- > fb9fc2c19918 for a sample fail report. > > Additionally, by using test.pl instead of t/*.t failures are not > visible at cpantesters, so http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tie- > Hash-Layered+0.9 looks quite green in spite of the existing test > failures.

Probably it worked only until 5.6.x. I clicked a little bit on cpantesters test reports, and I found only (hidden) fail reports for perl 5.8.0 and later.

Wed Sep 23 09:06:19 2015 SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added

On 2015-09-23 08:56:20, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text

> On 2015-09-23 08:53:53, SREZIC wrote:

> > See http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/91830c7a-2464-11e4-9114- > > fb9fc2c19918 for a sample fail report. > > > > Additionally, by using test.pl instead of t/*.t failures are not > > visible at cpantesters, so http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tie- > > Hash-Layered+0.9 looks quite green in spite of the existing test > > failures.

> > Probably it worked only until 5.6.x. I clicked a little bit on > cpantesters test reports, and I found only (hidden) fail reports for > perl 5.8.0 and later.

It seems that the failing test cases are assuming a specific sort order when using each() and keys().