Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the NetHack-NAOdash CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 106753
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: NetHack-NAOdash

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: 0.002
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Dependency Text::XLogfile is problematic
Text::XLogfile looks quite unmaintained. It is not installable out-of-the box on many systems, see http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Text-XLogfile%200.05 , probably because of the bug described in this four-year-old bug report: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=66992 Maybe you can take over the maintenance of this module, or find another solution?
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #106753] Dependency Text::XLogfile is problematic
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:53:03 +0300
To: bug-NetHack-NAOdash [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Marius Gavrilescu <marius [...] ieval.ro>
Thanks for telling me about this problem, I wasn't aware of it. I'd agree to take over the module. However, I see the module has quite a few comaintainers (DOY, ETHER, FLORA, STEVAN), and SARTAK has three releases this year (last one in June). Is anyone currently trying to adopt this module, or did anyone talk to SARTAK directly about it? If not, I'll mail SARTAK and ask for comaint. -- Marius Gavrilescu
Download signature.asc
application/pgp-signature 818b

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.

On 2015-08-29 10:53:39, MGV wrote: Show quoted text
> > Thanks for telling me about this problem, I wasn't aware of it. > > I'd agree to take over the module. However, I see the module has quite a > few comaintainers (DOY, ETHER, FLORA, STEVAN), and SARTAK has three > releases this year (last one in June). Is anyone currently trying to > adopt this module, or did anyone talk to SARTAK directly about it?
As far as I know, there's no platform where CPAN adoption attempts are documented. So ... Show quoted text
> If not, I'll mail SARTAK and ask for comaint.
... it's probably best to talk directly with SARTAK.
On 2015-08-29 07:53:39, MGV wrote: Show quoted text
> > Thanks for telling me about this problem, I wasn't aware of it. > > I'd agree to take over the module. However, I see the module has quite a > few comaintainers (DOY, ETHER, FLORA, STEVAN), and SARTAK has three > releases this year (last one in June). Is anyone currently trying to > adopt this module, or did anyone talk to SARTAK directly about it? > > If not, I'll mail SARTAK and ask for comaint.
I didn't know about the bug until just now -- I'd received comaint after its creation. I'll take a look at it tonight. (In the future, when there are longstanding bugs that need to be resolved, a poke on the bug itself can remind the maintainers that it exists.)
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #106753] Dependency Text::XLogfile is problematic
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:11:53 +0300
To: "Karen Etheridge via RT" <bug-NetHack-NAOdash [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Marius Gavrilescu <marius [...] ieval.ro>
"Karen Etheridge via RT" <bug-NetHack-NAOdash@rt.cpan.org> writes: Show quoted text
> I didn't know about the bug until just now -- I'd received comaint after its creation. > > I'll take a look at it tonight.
Thanks! Show quoted text
> (In the future, when there are longstanding bugs that need to be > resolved, a poke on the bug itself can remind the maintainers that it > exists.)
Alright, I'll remember that. -- Marius Gavrilescu
Download signature.asc
application/pgp-signature 818b

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.

On 2015-08-31 17:12:31, MGV wrote: Show quoted text
> "Karen Etheridge via RT" <bug-NetHack-NAOdash@rt.cpan.org> writes: >
> > I didn't know about the bug until just now -- I'd received comaint > > after its creation. > > > > I'll take a look at it tonight.
> > Thanks! >
> > (In the future, when there are longstanding bugs that need to be > > resolved, a poke on the bug itself can remind the maintainers that it > > exists.)
> > Alright, I'll remember that.
Dependency is fixed now, resolving.