Skip Menu |

Preferred bug tracker

Please visit the preferred bug tracker to report your issue.

This queue is for tickets about the Email-Stuffer CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 104299
Status: rejected
Priority: 0/
Queue: Email-Stuffer

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: gabor [...] szabgab.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Order of methods matter in Email::Stuffer 0.012
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:54:21 +0300
To: bug-email-stuffer [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Gabor Szabo <gabor [...] szabgab.com>
Thank you for the great module! I just bumped into this issue using Email::Stuffer 0.012 If I create the email this way: Email::Stuffer->text_body($text)->subject($subject)->from($from)->to($to)->send; The generated e-mail in my Mailfolder looks like this: ------------------------------- Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:47:04 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Experiment X-Email-Sender-From: gabor@perlmaven.com X-Email-Sender-To: gabor@szabgab.com Lines: 1 Text ------------------------------- and the message is rejected by Google due to lack of RFC conformity. If I change the order of the calls to Email::Stuffer->text_body($text)->from($from)->to($to)->subject($subject)->send; ----------------------------- Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:51:12 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: G Sz <gabor@perlmaven.com> To: gabor@szabgab.com Subject: Experiment X-Email-Sender-From: gabor@perlmaven.com X-Email-Sender-To: gabor@szabgab.com Lines: 2 Experimental message ------------------------------ and the message is delivered properly. I don't think I saw in the docs that the order matters. So this seems to be either a bug in the code or a need to updated the docs. Gabor
This is also https://github.com/rjbs/Email-Stuffer/issues/24 so I'm closing this ticket so I only see it one place. :-) -- rjbs