Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the String-Canonical CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 103340
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: String-Canonical

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: PLICEASE [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: fails with older versions of Text::Roman
I suspect that this patch would fix almost all of the failures reported by cpantesters. diff --git a/Makefile.PL b/Makefile.PL index 81f4c87..677e19a 100644 --- a/Makefile.PL +++ b/Makefile.PL @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ WriteMakefile( PREREQ_PM => { Test::Simple => 0, Lingua::EN::Numericalize => 0, - Text::Roman => 0, + Text::Roman => "3.4", } );
On 2015-04-06 13:10:28, PLICEASE wrote: Show quoted text
> I suspect that this patch would fix almost all of the failures > reported by cpantesters. > > diff --git a/Makefile.PL b/Makefile.PL > index 81f4c87..677e19a 100644 > --- a/Makefile.PL > +++ b/Makefile.PL > @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ WriteMakefile( > PREREQ_PM => { > Test::Simple => 0, > Lingua::EN::Numericalize => 0, > - Text::Roman => 0, > + Text::Roman => "3.4", > } > );
It seems that even Text::Roman 3.3 is good enough: http://analysis.cpantesters.org/reports_by_field?distv=String-Canonical-1.2;field=mod%3AText%3A%3ARoman
On Wed Apr 08 03:10:43 2015, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> On 2015-04-06 13:10:28, PLICEASE wrote:
> > I suspect that this patch would fix almost all of the failures > > reported by cpantesters. > > > > diff --git a/Makefile.PL b/Makefile.PL > > index 81f4c87..677e19a 100644 > > --- a/Makefile.PL > > +++ b/Makefile.PL > > @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ WriteMakefile( > > PREREQ_PM => { > > Test::Simple => 0, > > Lingua::EN::Numericalize => 0, > > - Text::Roman => 0, > > + Text::Roman => "3.4", > > } > > );
> > It seems that even Text::Roman 3.3 is good enough: > http://analysis.cpantesters.org/reports_by_field?distv=String- > Canonical-1.2;field=mod%3AText%3A%3ARoman
Could be. I tested 3.02 which seems to have been released after 3.3 (?) Anyway, the first would be similar.