Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 103181
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: 0.02
Fixed in: 0.04



Subject: Moose::Autobox not declared as a prereq?
On Sun Mar 29 13:09:05 2015, SREZIC wrote: Show quoted text
> See http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/47afda62-d19b-11e4-a193- > 15e1e0bfc7aa for a sample fail report.
Thanks for the report. I'm retiring and deleting this module from PAUSE, as: 1) I no longer think the idea behind the module is a good one; 2) the same thing can be achieved using something like Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertExample or Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertCodeOutput or Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertCommandResult.
On 2015-03-30 23:48:58, SHARYANTO wrote: Show quoted text
> On Sun Mar 29 13:09:05 2015, SREZIC wrote:
> > See http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/47afda62-d19b-11e4-a193- > > 15e1e0bfc7aa for a sample fail report.
> > > Thanks for the report. I'm retiring and deleting this module from > PAUSE, as: 1) I no longer think the idea behind the module is a good > one; 2) the same thing can be achieved using something like > Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertExample or > Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertCodeOutput or > Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertCommandResult.
Will you follow the deletion process as described in http://neilb.org/2013/12/21/deleting-from-cpan.html ? (I see that there's at least one distribution using your module)
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #103181] Moose::Autobox not declared as a prereq?
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:22:12 +0700
To: bug-Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Steven Haryanto <stevenharyanto [...] gmail.com>
Hm, didn't realize that. I'll cancel deleting the module and will update adding Moose::Autobox prereq instead. Thanks. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Slaven_Rezic via RT < bug-Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> Queue: Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=103181 > > > On 2015-03-30 23:48:58, SHARYANTO wrote:
> > On Sun Mar 29 13:09:05 2015, SREZIC wrote:
> > > See http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/47afda62-d19b-11e4-a193- > > > 15e1e0bfc7aa for a sample fail report.
> > > > > > Thanks for the report. I'm retiring and deleting this module from > > PAUSE, as: 1) I no longer think the idea behind the module is a good > > one; 2) the same thing can be achieved using something like > > Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertExample or > > Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertCodeOutput or > > Dist::Zilla::Plugin::InsertCommandResult.
> > Will you follow the deletion process as described in > http://neilb.org/2013/12/21/deleting-from-cpan.html ? (I see that there's > at least one distribution using your module) >
also FYI please note that there's been a drive in the community lately to remove Moose::Autobox from trivial uses in cpan distributions, since it has not passed tests in blead since 5.21.5 and therefore blocks other blead development.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #103181] Moose::Autobox not declared as a prereq?
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:10:49 +0700
To: bug-Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Steven Haryanto <stevenharyanto [...] gmail.com>
Yeah, I noticed it too. I don't use Moose or Moose::Autobox personally myself, most code for my Dist::Zilla or Pod::Weaver plugins began as copy-paste code, often from RJBS, which used to contain lots of Moose::Autobox stuffs. Turns out that there is no actual usage of Moose::Autobox in the current code. New version released. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Karen Etheridge via RT < bug-Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> Queue: Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=103181 > > > also FYI please note that there's been a drive in the community lately to > remove Moose::Autobox from trivial uses in cpan distributions, since it has > not passed tests in blead since 5.21.5 and therefore blocks other blead > development. >
On 2015-03-31 20:11:01, stevenharyanto@gmail.com wrote: Show quoted text
> Yeah, I noticed it too. I don't use Moose or Moose::Autobox personally > myself, most code for my Dist::Zilla or Pod::Weaver plugins began as > copy-paste code, often from RJBS, which used to contain lots of > Moose::Autobox stuffs. Turns out that there is no actual usage of > Moose::Autobox in the current code. New version released.
Simple solution :-) Show quoted text
> > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Karen Etheridge via RT < > bug-Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes@rt.cpan.org> wrote: >
> > Queue: Pod-Weaver-Section-Changes > > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=103181 > > > > > also FYI please note that there's been a drive in the community > > lately to > > remove Moose::Autobox from trivial uses in cpan distributions, since > > it has > > not passed tests in blead since 5.21.5 and therefore blocks other > > blead > > development. > >