On Wed Mar 25 12:33:07 2015, ETHER wrote:
Show quoted text> It's a real bug report, but you're right that I don't use your
> distribution. The intent is genuine - to move everyone off a legacy
> module where we've discovered a lot of serious issues that aren't
> getting fixed, onto other things that are more actively maintained and
> address these issues.
Indeed, I really like the Path::Tiny interfaces and already changed a large percentage of my shell-script-kit environment (non-public) and this module and a couple other things. The issues still don't seem like all that big a deal to me. I find it concerning that the encoding layers are doing the wrong thing. Some day that could be foolled into … unimagined remote execution bugs … I mean, one never knows. But besides that, they don't seem like that big a deal to me.
Who's using slurp() for anything other than loading small trusted files for tests or something anyway?
-Paul
--
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming.
116 jumps, 48.6 minutes of freefall, 92.9 freefall miles.