RT for rt.cpan.org
Skip Menu
|
Bug #102993 for Text-ASCIITable: Why not document the 'utf8' option?
Active bugs
Resolved bugs
Rejected bugs
This queue is for tickets about the
Text-ASCIITable CPAN distribution
.
Report information
The Basics
Id:
102993
Status:
resolved
Priority:
0/
Queue:
Text-ASCIITable
People
Owner:
Nobody in particular
Requestors:
bpj [...] melroch.se
Cc:
AdminCc:
Bug Information
Severity:
(no value)
Broken in:
(no value)
Fixed in:
(no value)
History
Show all quoted text
Sun Mar 22 08:00:44 2015
bpj [...] melroch.se - Ticket created
Subject:
Why not document the 'utf8' option?
Date:
Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:00:27 +0100
To:
bug-Text-ASCIITable [...] rt.cpan.org
From:
BP Jonsson <bpj [...] melroch.se>
Why not document the 'utf8' option? One *really* needs to set it to false when working with Unicode data! /bpj
Sun Mar 22 13:28:38 2015
SREZIC [...] cpan.org - Correspondence added
On 2015-03-22 08:00:44, bpj@melroch.se wrote:
Show quoted text
> Why not document the 'utf8' option? One *really* needs to set it > to false when working with Unicode data!
Probably it's an error that there's a utf8 option at all... the decode() call within the module shouldn't be needed at all.
Sun Mar 22 13:28:39 2015
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
Thu Dec 29 12:10:16 2016
haakon [...] _NOSPAM_loopback.no - Correspondence added
Fixed in 0.22
Thu Dec 29 12:10:17 2016
haakon [...] _NOSPAM_loopback.no - Status changed from 'open' to 'resolved'