Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the Catalyst-Authentication-Store-Htpasswd CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 102187
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Catalyst-Authentication-Store-Htpasswd

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: christopher.hoskin [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: POD contains broken links and malformed formatting
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:02:06 +0000
To: bug-catalyst-authentication-store-htpasswd [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin [...] gmail.com>
In Debian we are currently applying the attached patch to Catalyst-Authentication-Store-Htpasswd. We thought you might be interested in it, too. Description: Fix broken links and malformed formatting in POD Author: Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin@gmail.com> Last-Update: 2015-02-17 Thanks in advance, Christopher Hoskin, Debian Perl Group

Message body is not shown because sender requested not to inline it.

Thanks, applied and released as 1.019.
Thanks, applied and released as 1.006.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #102187] POD contains broken links and malformed formatting
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:19:15 +0100
To: bug-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-Htpasswd [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Christopher Hoskin <christopher.hoskin [...] gmail.com>
Thanks. There's still one hunk in the patch file I was applying that you didn't apply, see the updated patch file (attached). Not sure if this is because you decided it wasn't appropriate, or if it was overlooked? Thanks. Christopher On 3 July 2017 at 20:31, Karen Etheridge via RT <bug-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-Htpasswd@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=102187 > > > Thanks, applied and released as 1.006.

Message body is not shown because sender requested not to inline it.

On 2017-07-04 00:19:24, christopher.hoskin@gmail.com wrote: Show quoted text
> Thanks. There's still one hunk in the patch file I was applying that > you didn't apply, see the updated patch file (attached). Not sure if > this is because you decided it wasn't appropriate, or if it was > overlooked?
The patch didn't apply cleanly, so I applied some bits manually. I thought I'd gotten them all; sorry about that!