Skip Menu |

This queue is for tickets about the MooX-Types-MooseLike-Numeric CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 101972
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: MooX-Types-MooseLike-Numeric

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: w.phillip.moore [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 1.02



Subject: Missing the Moo dependency
The metadata for this module doesn't specify the Moo dependency, possibly the most important one. Can you please add this to the next release?
Show quoted text
> The metadata for this module doesn't specify the Moo dependency, > possibly the most important one. Can you please add this to the next > release?
The module does not actually require Moo to run.
fr. 06. feb. 2015 21.40.41 skrev MATEU: Show quoted text
> > The metadata for this module doesn't specify the Moo dependency, > > possibly the most important one. Can you please add this to the next > > release?
> > The module does not actually require Moo to run.
Sorr for bringing this up again. Got bitten by this again. You are right actually. But, for running the tests to build this as a debian package. It seems it needs Moo for t/numeric.t, shouldn't a test requires be added for Moo then? Or perhaps do an eval-ed require or similar?
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #101972] Missing the Moo dependency
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:02:35 -0700
To: bug-MooX-Types-MooseLike-Numeric [...] rt.cpan.org
From: "Mateu X. Hunter" <hunter [...] missoula.org>
You are right, it's missing from the BUILD requirements in the Makefile.PL. I've fixed that in version 1.03 which is now on CPAN. Thanks for your input! 2017-01-19 14:26 GMT-07:00 Nicolas Mendoza via RT < bug-MooX-Types-MooseLike-Numeric@rt.cpan.org>: Show quoted text
> Queue: MooX-Types-MooseLike-Numeric > Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=101972 > > > fr. 06. feb. 2015 21.40.41 skrev MATEU:
> > > The metadata for this module doesn't specify the Moo dependency, > > > possibly the most important one. Can you please add this to the next > > > release?
> > > > The module does not actually require Moo to run.
> > Sorr for bringing this up again. Got bitten by this again. You are right > actually. > > But, for running the tests to build this as a debian package. It seems it > needs Moo for t/numeric.t, shouldn't a test requires be added for Moo then? > Or perhaps do an eval-ed require or similar? >